Re: [VOTE] new operator ?=

2016-11-28 Thread Daniel Sun
improve for Groovy. >> >> Jason >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Daniel Sun [mailto:> href="x-msg://14/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=5736959i=6" >> target="_top" rel="nofollow" link="external" class="

Re: [VOTE] new operator ?=

2016-11-26 Thread Russel Winder
On Wed, 2016-11-23 at 19:47 +0100, Andres Almiray wrote: > Long live pompaduor walrus ... > > What would be an appropriate nickname for ?=, I wonder. > Elvis has left the building. ;-) -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder

Re: [VOTE] new operator ?=

2016-11-25 Thread Daniel Sun
-- View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-new-operator-tp5736931p5737003.html Sent from the Groovy Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] new operator ?=

2016-11-24 Thread Henrik Martin
://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-new-operator-tp5736931.html Sent from the Groovy Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Aw: [VOTE] new operator ?=

2016-11-24 Thread Susanne Jaeckel
realblue...@hotmail.com> An: us...@groovy.incubator.apache.org Betreff: [VOTE] new operator ?= Hi all, If the new operator ?= (e.g. a ?= 'foo' is equivalent of a = a ?: 'foo') were to be added to Groovy programming language, do you like it? (Yes: +1; No: -1; Not bad: 0) Cheers, Daniel.S

Re: [VOTE] new operator ?=

2016-11-23 Thread Leo Bartoloni
t think >>> the >>> >> operator hurts, and it's certainly not any less intuitive than <=> for >>> >> example or even ?: when seen for the very first time. It's an easy >>> look up >>> >> in Groovy docs, and if you don't know it and

Re: [VOTE] new operator ?=

2016-11-23 Thread Daniel Sun
t;> I'd normally use Elvis at time of initial assignment. I wouldn't put it very >> high on a prioritized backlog of things to improve for Groovy. >> >> Jason >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Daniel Sun [mailto:[hidden >> email]] >> Sen

Re: [VOTE] new operator ?=

2016-11-23 Thread Gerald Wiltse
zed backlog of things to improve for Groovy. > > Jason > > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Sun [mailto:realblue...@hotmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 10:59 AM > To: us...@groovy.incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] new operator ?= > >

RE: [VOTE] new operator ?=

2016-11-23 Thread Winnebeck, Jason
time of initial assignment. I wouldn't put it very high on a prioritized backlog of things to improve for Groovy. Jason -Original Message- From: Daniel Sun [mailto:realblue...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 10:59 AM To: us...@groovy.incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOT

Re: [VOTE] new operator ?=

2016-11-23 Thread Clayton Long
re to be added to Groovy programming language, do you like it? > (Yes: +1; No: -1; Not bad: 0) > > Cheers, > Daniel.Sun > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-new-operator-tp5736931.html > Sent from the Groovy Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] new operator ?=

2016-11-23 Thread Edgar Harutyunyan
org <mailto:users@groovy.apache.org> > <users@groovy.apache.org> <mailto:users@groovy.apache.org> > Date: 23. november 2016 at 16.59.10 > To: us...@groovy.incubator.apache.org > <mailto:us...@groovy.incubator.apache.org> > <us...@groovy.incubato

Re: [VOTE] new operator ?=

2016-11-23 Thread Jim Northrop
t;> Hi all, >> >> If the new operator ?= (e.g. a ?= 'foo' is equivalent of a = a ?: >> 'foo') were to be added to Groovy programming language, do you like it? >> (Yes: +1; No: -1; Not bad: 0) >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel.Sun >> >>

Re: [VOTE] new operator ?=

2016-11-23 Thread Abhinav Sharma
ivalent of a = a ?: > > 'foo') were to be added to Groovy programming language, do you like it? > > (Yes: +1; No: -1; Not bad: 0) > > > > Cheers, > > Daniel.Sun > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5. > nabble.com/VOTE-new-operator-tp5736931.html > > Sent from the Groovy Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >

Re: [VOTE] new operator ?=

2016-11-23 Thread Andres Almiray
guage, do you like it? > (Yes: +1; No: -1; Not bad: 0) > > Cheers, > Daniel.Sun > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5. > nabble.com/VOTE-new-operator-tp5736931.html > Sent from the Groovy Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: [VOTE] new operator ?=

2016-11-23 Thread GR8Conf EU
y.incubator.apache.org> <us...@groovy.incubator.apache.org> Subject: [VOTE] new operator ?= Hi all, If the new operator ?= (e.g. a ?= 'foo' is equivalent of a = a ?: 'foo') were to be added to Groovy programming language, do you like it? (Yes: +1; No: -1; Not bad: 0) Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- View this message

Re: [VOTE] new operator ?=

2016-11-23 Thread David Dawson
') were to be added to Groovy programming language, do you like it? >>> (Yes: +1; No: -1; Not bad: 0) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Daniel.Sun >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble

Re: [VOTE] new operator ?=

2016-11-23 Thread Guillaume Laforge
; If the new operator ?= (e.g. a ?= 'foo' is equivalent of a = a ?: >>> 'foo') were to be added to Groovy programming language, do you like it? >>> (Yes: +1; No: -1; Not bad: 0) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Daniel.Sun >>> >>> >>> &g

Re: [VOTE] new operator ?=

2016-11-23 Thread Guillaume Laforge
ot bad: 0) > > Cheers, > Daniel.Sun > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5. > nabble.com/VOTE-new-operator-tp5736931.html > Sent from the Groovy Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Guillaume Laforge Apache Groovy committer