improve for Groovy.
>>
>> Jason
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Daniel Sun [mailto:> href="x-msg://14/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=5736959i=6"
>> target="_top" rel="nofollow" link="external" class="
On Wed, 2016-11-23 at 19:47 +0100, Andres Almiray wrote:
> Long live pompaduor walrus ...
>
> What would be an appropriate nickname for ?=, I wonder.
>
Elvis has left the building.
;-)
--
Russel.
=
Dr Russel Winder
--
View this message in context:
http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-new-operator-tp5736931p5737003.html
Sent from the Groovy Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-new-operator-tp5736931.html
Sent from the Groovy Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
realblue...@hotmail.com>
An: us...@groovy.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: [VOTE] new operator ?=
Hi all,
If the new operator ?= (e.g. a ?= 'foo' is equivalent of a = a ?:
'foo') were to be added to Groovy programming language, do you like it?
(Yes: +1; No: -1; Not bad: 0)
Cheers,
Daniel.S
t think
>>> the
>>> >> operator hurts, and it's certainly not any less intuitive than <=> for
>>> >> example or even ?: when seen for the very first time. It's an easy
>>> look up
>>> >> in Groovy docs, and if you don't know it and
t;> I'd normally use Elvis at time of initial assignment. I wouldn't put it very
>> high on a prioritized backlog of things to improve for Groovy.
>>
>> Jason
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Daniel Sun [mailto:[hidden
>> email]]
>> Sen
zed backlog of things to improve for Groovy.
>
> Jason
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Sun [mailto:realblue...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 10:59 AM
> To: us...@groovy.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] new operator ?=
>
>
time of initial assignment. I wouldn't put it very high
on a prioritized backlog of things to improve for Groovy.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Sun [mailto:realblue...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 10:59 AM
To: us...@groovy.incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOT
re to be added to Groovy programming language, do you like it?
> (Yes: +1; No: -1; Not bad: 0)
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel.Sun
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-new-operator-tp5736931.html
> Sent from the Groovy Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
org <mailto:users@groovy.apache.org>
> <users@groovy.apache.org> <mailto:users@groovy.apache.org>
> Date: 23. november 2016 at 16.59.10
> To: us...@groovy.incubator.apache.org
> <mailto:us...@groovy.incubator.apache.org>
> <us...@groovy.incubato
t;> Hi all,
>>
>> If the new operator ?= (e.g. a ?= 'foo' is equivalent of a = a ?:
>> 'foo') were to be added to Groovy programming language, do you like it?
>> (Yes: +1; No: -1; Not bad: 0)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel.Sun
>>
>>
ivalent of a = a ?:
> > 'foo') were to be added to Groovy programming language, do you like it?
> > (Yes: +1; No: -1; Not bad: 0)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Daniel.Sun
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5.
> nabble.com/VOTE-new-operator-tp5736931.html
> > Sent from the Groovy Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
guage, do you like it?
> (Yes: +1; No: -1; Not bad: 0)
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel.Sun
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5.
> nabble.com/VOTE-new-operator-tp5736931.html
> Sent from the Groovy Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
y.incubator.apache.org>
<us...@groovy.incubator.apache.org>
Subject: [VOTE] new operator ?=
Hi all,
If the new operator ?= (e.g. a ?= 'foo' is equivalent of a = a ?:
'foo') were to be added to Groovy programming language, do you like it?
(Yes: +1; No: -1; Not bad: 0)
Cheers,
Daniel.Sun
--
View this message
') were to be added to Groovy programming language, do you like it?
>>> (Yes: +1; No: -1; Not bad: 0)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel.Sun
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble
; If the new operator ?= (e.g. a ?= 'foo' is equivalent of a = a ?:
>>> 'foo') were to be added to Groovy programming language, do you like it?
>>> (Yes: +1; No: -1; Not bad: 0)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel.Sun
>>>
>>>
>>>
&g
ot bad: 0)
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel.Sun
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5.
> nabble.com/VOTE-new-operator-tp5736931.html
> Sent from the Groovy Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Guillaume Laforge
Apache Groovy committer
18 matches
Mail list logo