I'm all on board for integrating into Groovy, and I'm letting that drive
design decisions as I finish up the changes. I appreciate the feedback on
the API--I will definitely take it all under consideration. Perhaps we
should move integration-related discussions over to the dev mailing list.
-Joe
I also think it's sane to keep the Java 8 ordering in this case.
Even if we can use ranges, keeping upto / downto in addition would be kind
to people used to using them.
Anyhow, very nice work!
I still believe we need to integrate it to Groovy core :-)
Guillaume
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 8:10
Right Ahm,
Good point. Backward compatibility helps not only us old-time groovy ppl but
also the new generation of converts to Groovy ✅
Sent from my iPad
> On 26 Jun 2017, at 08:10, Ahm Avoby wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> @static parse(): I am with you on keeping the Java
Hi Jim,
@static parse(): I am with you on keeping the Java 8 API ordering, but I
would not jettison the upto and downto methods, as to not confuse people
switching from Java 8 to Groovy.
Cheers,
Ahm
Joe Wolf schrieb am So., 25. Juni 2017, 23:32:
> Goodtimes 1.1 is out with