Re: How to generate groovydoc?

> The info is a little outdated I hope I’m not being misunderstood. Currently we bundle Groovy 2.5.11 into IntelliJ, and I’m only saying that the "Generate Groovydoc” action would’ve failed if run against the Groovy source files which use Groovy 3 features. — Daniil Ovchinnikov J

Re: How to generate groovydoc?

For more info see https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-80697#focus=Comments-27-3935496.0-0 — Daniil Ovchinnikov JetBrains > On 30 Jul 2020, at 20:10, Fernando Franzini > wrote: > > Hi Keith > > What version of IntelliJ are you using? > 2020.xx > > The o

Re: IntelliJ IDEA Groovy 2.5/3.0 - IntelliJ 2020.1

Hi all, There is actually little to no sense in upvoting the umbrella issue, but upvotes on particular features greatly help us to prioritize them, e.g. @MapConstructor will be done next. Daniil Ovchinnikov JetBrains > On 14 Apr 2020, at 11:19, MG wrote: > > Hi , > >

Re: [parrot] Command expressions in array initializer

not supported in argument lists in < 3.x. — Daniil Ovchinnikov JetBrains > On 5 Jul 2018, at 16:41, Daniel.Sun wrote: > > Good suggestion. > Besides the array initializer, argument list should be considered to stop > supporting command expression too. > &

[parrot] Command expressions in array initializer

. — Daniil Ovchinnikov JetBrains

Re: About the groovy code style

, unless you decide to support such corner cases in 3.0. — Daniil Ovchinnikov JetBrains > On 4 Jul 2018, at 14:27, Daniel.Sun wrote: > > Yep. Daniil. > > > > - > Daniel Sun > Apache Groovy committer > Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me > Twitter: @daniel_sun &

Re: About the groovy code style

You mean me? — Daniil Ovchinnikov JetBrains > On 4 Jul 2018, at 05:39, Daniel.Sun wrote: > > ping Danil :-) > > > > - > Daniel Sun > Apache Groovy committer > Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me > Twitter: @daniel_sun > > -- > Sent from: http:

Re: IntelliJ: Full Groovy 2.5.0 Support

get about it. At least you will get a notification when each task is closed contrary to umbrella task that may remain open for a long time. > I would just do the ones that are quicker to do first That’s what I’m now doing with 3.0 tasks. But upvotes do matter. — Daniil Ovchinnikov JetBrains >

Re: IntelliJ: Full Groovy 2.5.0 Support

for it. — Daniil Ovchinnikov JetBrains > On 1 Jun 2018, at 21:09, MG wrote: > > Hi, > > I have created a Jetbrains issue you can vote on for IntelliJ to fully > support Groovy 2.5 as soon as possible :-) > > https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-193168 > > Cheers, > mg > > > > >

Re: Groovy 3 lambda, method reference, default methods

It will be deduced it from library with a single switch to use Parrot in 2.6. There is no other reason not to use library version, since Groovy can’t cross compile classes to run with old Groovy versions. — Daniil Ovchinnikov Software Developer JetBrains jetbrains.com “Drive to develop

Re: Groovy 3 lambda, method reference, default methods

parsers for (almost) each language. — Daniil Ovchinnikov Software Developer JetBrains jetbrains.com “Drive to develop” > On 21 Mar 2018, at 22:30, mg <mg...@arscreat.com> wrote: > > I guess the Groovy 3.0/3.0-- (aka 2.6) syntax elements support will be > switchable in Intel

Re: Improving named-argument support

erage default params instead of introducing ‘required’? I.e. all named params are required by default. — Daniil Ovchinnikov Software Developer JetBrains jetbrains.com “Drive to develop”