[EMAIL PROTECTED] Any problems deleting all _default_ VirtualHosts?

2006-10-29 Thread ohaya
Hi, I was wondering if anyone has tried deleting/commenting out ALL of the _default_ VirtualHost sections in httpd.conf/ssl.conf? Does doing this cause any problems with Apache? One of my colleagues has suggested that doing this helps secure Apache, because then Apache wouldn't process any

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] interaction btn apache and cronolog

2006-10-29 Thread Thushara Wijeratna
Seems like the parent apache process creates the pipe to cronolog. The children must be sending their output to the parent that will in turn pipe it to cronolog. The only other thing is that we're using an environment variable expansion (macro) in the CustomLog string, as described here :

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any problems deleting all _default_ VirtualHosts?

2006-10-29 Thread Joshua Slive
On 10/29/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I was wondering if anyone has tried deleting/commenting out ALL of the _default_ VirtualHost sections in httpd.conf/ssl.conf? Does doing this cause any problems with Apache? One of my colleagues has suggested that doing this helps

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 , Cronolog 1.6.X on Win2K

2006-10-29 Thread toadie D
It seems that cronolog does not play well with apache 2.2.3 . when you shut down apache, none of the cronolog sessions are terminated. they just left hanging. This didn't happen with Apache 2.0.5X. I looked at the cronolog src code and none of it is Apache specific so I would assume that you

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any problems deleting all _default_ VirtualHosts?

2006-10-29 Thread ohaya
Also, when we tried that (deleting the _default_ sections), I *think* (but am not sure) that we may have been seeing some behavior where Apache would slow down, i.e., serve content very slowly. No. It should make no difference in speed. Joshua, Thanks for the response(s). Re. the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any problems deleting all _default_ VirtualHosts?

2006-10-29 Thread Joshua Slive
On 10/29/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the response(s). Re. the comments above, my understanding of the way the Apache works is that when it receives an incoming request, it searches through the VirtualHosts that have been defined, for a match, and I was thinking

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any problems deleting all _default_ VirtualHosts?

2006-10-29 Thread ohaya
I think, but am not sure, that from some diagnostics we did at that time, it also looked like Apache was processing requests for IP address 0.0.0.0, which kind of puzzled me. By default apache listens on all available addresses. I don't know what is puzzling you about that. Joshua,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any problems deleting all _default_ VirtualHosts?

2006-10-29 Thread ohaya
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think, but am not sure, that from some diagnostics we did at that time, it also looked like Apache was processing requests for IP address 0.0.0.0, which kind of puzzled me. By default apache listens on all available addresses. I don't know what

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache process hanging

2006-10-29 Thread Sai Jai Ganesh Gurubaran
Hi All, we notice that some time (not consistent) some of the Apache process hang. They start taking memory and do nothing. Here is the strace of one such process strace p 5762 futex(0x9dfe690, FUTEX_WAKE, 1) = 0 gettimeofday({1161960021, 481837}, NULL) = 0