Re: Portweiterung schläg t fehl

On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 09:10:42AM +0200, Michael Hnat - bluegras wrote: Hallo, steht vor folgendem Problem: Ich habe einen Mailserver, der über einen eigenen Webserver auf Port 9998 läuft (smartermail). Da der Port bei manchen Kunden geblockt ist möchte ich den Webmailvlient gerne über

content negotiation

Hallo, ich versuche gerade content negotiation besser zu verstehen. Genaugenommen geht es mir im Moment um Language negotiation. Ich habe die Beispiele des apache manuals ausprobiert. Die MultiViews-Variante funktioniert ohne Probleme. Nachteil hierbei ist, dass das Sprachkürzel angehängt

Re: content negotiation

On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 01:33:24AM +0200, Oliver Block wrote: Ich habe die Beispiele des apache manuals ausprobiert. Die MultiViews-Variante funktioniert ohne Probleme. Nachteil hierbei ist, dass das Sprachkürzel angehängt wird, also index.html.de anstatt index.de.html. Das verursacht bei

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem with disk_cache on Windows 2003

Hello I'm trying to get mod_cache and mod_disk_cache to work correctly. Problem summary is that disk cache is not working properly - sending empty data to the client for some content like the css file. I use Apache as a reverse proxy. I get a lot of this messages in the log file: [Sun Jul 13

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] virtual hosting not working

Mike Brown wrote: On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:35:41AM +1000, Res wrote: Do you run your own (caching) DNS server? Nope. If so set up two views, one external that the world gets (your routable IP number of 75.100.112.198), the second view will have the domain with its internal LAN IP. The

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Logging query strings from a re-write rule

Hi there, I think you may have misunderstood the issue. Functionally my re-write rule is working okay but its logging the query string of the URL that I am sending the browser to. If that makes sense.. Steve -Original Message- From: Francois Gingras [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: tomcat, apache with mod_jk and mod_auth_kerb

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First of all 5.5.12 is very outdated and also very early in the 5.5 release cycle. You need to add 'tomcatAuthentication=false' in the Connector element for your AJP connector. The connector you showed us above is - an

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: tomcat, apache with mod_jk and mod_auth_kerb

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Nikhil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First of all 5.5.12 is very outdated and also very early in the 5.5 release cycle. You need to add 'tomcatAuthentication=false' in the Connector element

[EMAIL PROTECTED] proxypass problems

Hi all, again... I am a total apache newbie. What I have is: - A webserver in my dmz with a dedicated vhost + ip - A ssh tunnel to an internal webserver - An internal webserver with a directory called mirror in / As you might imagine I want to access the dir mirror on the dmz webserver. This is

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Logging query strings from a re-write rule

Ah, let's see your CustomLog directive, please. On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:22 AM, Foster, Stephen (ASPIRE) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there, I think you may have misunderstood the issue. Functionally my re-write rule is working okay but its logging the query string of the URL that I am

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: tomcat, apache with mod_jk and mod_auth_kerb

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Again, the http connector is *not* what you need to edit, if you want to combine Tomcat with mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp. It is the AJP connector. See my previous mail. You need to add tomcatAuthentication=false to that

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: tomcat, apache with mod_jk and mod_auth_kerb

Rainer, I seem to have found a related link on this but this is really old pertaining to the older versions of Tomcat.. any suggestions please. http://marc.info/?t=10431829842r=1w=2

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: need help

What devilishly _clever_ Subject: content!! - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem installing apache

nopes... it doesn't work with setenforce 0 either..   --- On Sat, 7/12/08, Graeme Fowler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Graeme Fowler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem installing apache (resending) To: users@httpd.apache.org Date: Saturday, July 12, 2008, 8:53 AM On Fri,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: tomcat, apache with mod_jk and mod_auth_kerb

On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:14:02 +0530 Nikhil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No he didn't. Well, not in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please don't add this list when following up to a post on a different list. It's just confusing. -- Nick

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: tomcat, apache with mod_jk and mod_auth_kerb

I tried out Tomcat6 too and added 'tomcatAuthentication=false' to the ajp connector but that still not work. :-( On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Nikhil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rainer, I seem to have found a related link on this but this is really old pertaining to the older versions of

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Authentication via x509 or password/otp

Hello Apache-Pros, I'm currently looking for a solution to fulfill the following authentication requirements: - Endusers do have a smartcard based ssl client certificate and a password or later OTP generator (e.g. RSA SecurID) The scenario should be as following: - If it's possible for the

[EMAIL PROTECTED] get users sessions informations from apache

Hello everyone:) Let me know how I can retrieve the status of the sessions of all users connected to my site, so whether the session of a user expired or not. is that it is possible that apache dialoge with another program and then submit the status of sessions. I use Apache 2.0.63.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] problem with php +apache

Hi   I recently managed to install apache 2.2.9 with mpm worker enabled . But when I try to start the httpd service, it fails saying:   [crit] Apache is running a threaded MPM, but your PHP Module is not compiled to be threadsafe.  You need to recompile PHP       How do i compile php module to

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem with php +apache

Hi, just use --enable-maintainer-zts directive in configure script On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Infocom Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I recently managed to install apache 2.2.9 with mpm worker enabled . But when I try to start the httpd service, it fails saying: [crit]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem with php +apache

The thing is , so far as i remember, i never enabled this option while compiling php..   but cannot understand why it is saying so this time ... --- On Mon, 7/14/08, Darvin Denmian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Darvin Denmian [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem with php

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Redirecting Problem (Wear)

Here's the problem I had this config in the httpd.conf RewriteEngine On RewriteLogLevel 9 RewriteLog logs/website/www.website.com-rewrite_log RewriteRule ^/(.*\.html)$ /index.php?$1 [L] RewriteRule ^/(.*\.htm)$ /index.php?$1 [L] But if I move this configuration from httpd.conf to .htaccess

[EMAIL PROTECTED] use mod_rewrite to answer a.php?xyz and serve /xyz ?

Hi, I know mod_rewrite can answer web request to /xyz and internally serving a.php?xyz . However, is it possible to answer a.php?xyz and internally serving /xyz , without writing a script a.php? For the curious minds, we are moving from dynamic scripts to pre-generated static pages, and want to

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: use mod_rewrite to answer a.php?xyz and serve /xyz ?

I tried, and apache complained a.php was not found on this server. Seems that apache took this as a script instead? On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Randy Grimes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I know mod_rewrite can answer web request to /xyz and internally serving a.php?xyz . However, is it

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Using rewrite to forward the request OR mod_perl

Mohit Anchlia wrote: [...] We have a web server that redirects traffic to app server using mod_jk load balancer. Now I need to do the following: 1. If request comes from URL /AB and content of URL /AB has content in certain format then forward it to mod_jk otherwise forward it to some other

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Forward proxies and aliases

Tavian Barnes wrote: When behind a proxy, the browser sends request to the proxy in the form of GET http://www.google.com/ig, rather than sending GET /ig to www.google.com. It has no idea if the proxy server did some tricky things behind its back. Thank you for reminding me of that. I

[EMAIL PROTECTED] How to configure Apache 2.x for HTTP 1.0 version?

Hi, I am working on Apache 2.x. The default protcol followed is HTTP 1.1. But HTTP 1.1 is a persistent protocol and hence I want Apache to follow HTTP 1.0 protocol. So, How to configure Apache 2.x for HTTP 1.0 version? -Anand

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem with Indexes

I have Options Indexes FollowSymLinks MultiViews and I try adding Options +Indexes in individual locations, but it never works. I do not get an auto-generated directory list, but an error if there is no index.html (or other index file I've configured). What am I missing? --John

[EMAIL PROTECTED] How to override Apache default headers?

Hi, I am using mod_proxy to establish proxy communication between TCP client and TCP server. When I send request from client to server through Apache as proxy, Apache adds the following headers automatically: POST / HTTP/1.1 Host: 192.168.56.17:9801 X-Forwarded-For: 192.168.56.17

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to configure Apache 2.x for HTTP 1.0 version?

On Jul 14, 2008, at 9:05 PM, Anand Kulkarni wrote: I am working on Apache 2.x. The default protcol followed is HTTP 1.1. But HTTP 1.1 is a persistent protocol and hence I want Apache to follow HTTP 1.0 protocol. What do you mean by 'persistent'? So, How to configure Apache 2.x for HTTP

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to configure Apache 2.x for HTTP 1.0 version?

Hi, I want HTTP 1.0 protocol because I heard that passing content length in HTTP 1.0 request is not mandatory. In my application, the client does not know the length of data to be sent to server through Apache as proxy. When I switched to HTTP 1.0 still its forcing content length in the request.