[users@httpd] Basic allow/deny based on cookies

2014-11-05 Thread Santiago DIEZ
Hello, Note: I'm a system administrator and I don't know that much about web developement. So I host what others develop. I'm trying to setup a web server with an application like this : */var/www/public* - It would be publicly accessible. Meaning any computer can load the content and I

RE: [users@httpd] Basic allow/deny based on cookies

2014-11-05 Thread Julien Etter
A better approach would be to use Client Certificate Authentication / Access Control _ From: Santiago DIEZ [mailto:santiago.d...@caoba.fr] Sent: 05 November 2014 09:01 To: Apache HTTP Users LIST Subject: [users@httpd] Basic allow/deny based on cookies Hello, Note: I'm a system

[users@httpd] Apache 2.4 Listen question

2014-11-05 Thread Rose, John B
It looks like just using Listen 80 on our system below defaults to IPv6. We do not have an IPv6 network. But on one of our web servers the web site is accessible. At the moment, to me, it looks like that should not be possible. When we explicitly put in the ip address, Listen 111.22.33.444:80,

Re: [users@httpd] Basic allow/deny based on cookies

2014-11-05 Thread Santiago DIEZ
Hi Julien, Thanks for the idea. Sounds very promising although quite hard to get into to me. I'll definitely thoroughly study the case. Is this the page http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/ssl/ssl_howto.html related to your proposal? Still, if anyone has an easier solution, I'm interested. Again,

Re: [users@httpd] Red Hat 7 Apache 2.4

2014-11-05 Thread Rose, John B
Fyi https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/ht ml/System_Administrators_Guide/ch-Web_Servers.html On 10/30/14 1:55 PM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/29/2014 03:25 PM, Rose, John B wrote: We have

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4 Listen question

2014-11-05 Thread Daniel
if you want to just listen to ipv4 do Listen 0.0.0.0:80 since as you say if ipv6 is present Listen 80 will default to that El Wed Nov 05 2014 at 4:38:49 PM, Rose, John B (jbr...@utk.edu) escribió: It looks like just using Listen 80 on our system below defaults to IPv6. We do not have an IPv6

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4 Listen question

2014-11-05 Thread Eric Covener
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Rose, John B jbr...@utk.edu wrote: It looks like just using Listen 80 on our system below defaults to IPv6. We do not have an IPv6 network. But on one of our web servers the web site is accessible. At the moment, to me, it looks like that should not be

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4 Listen question

2014-11-05 Thread Rose, John B
Thanks On 11/5/14 2:32 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Rose, John B jbr...@utk.edu wrote: It looks like just using Listen 80 on our system below defaults to IPv6. We do not have an IPv6 network. But on one of our web servers the web site is

Re: [users@httpd] Basic allow/deny based on cookies

2014-11-05 Thread Igor Cicimov
Questions Is my idea considerable ? I've read documentation of mod_access_compat and mod_usertrack but I don't see how to make them work together. Can anyone point me in the right direction ? I'm open to other suggestions given they fall into the constraints I mentioned above. Regardong

[users@httpd] Error when restarting server as root

2014-11-05 Thread Steve Matzura
I'm running version 2.2 on a Debian 4 system (OK, don't laugh please). It's been running swell for years. And before anyone says the answer to life, the universe and everything is to upgrade to 2.4, that's already been done on a test bed, and yes, I'm having the same problem over there. It's this: