Re: [users@httpd] Is proxy to proxy improving the security?

The weakest link is always the application at the end of the chain. Reverse proxying is basically handing down the request to another server, so what really matters IMHO is what you expose of the application to the upper layers and what those who access it can do with it. Considering the

Re: [users@httpd] Is proxy to proxy improving the security?

On 5/15/2021 10:21 AM, Jason Long wrote: Hello, Is proxy to proxy improving the security? For example: The Internet --> Reverse Proxy Server --> Reverse Proxy Server --> Web Site It really depends on what functions your proxies are performing. For example, are the reverse proxies simply

Re: [users@httpd] Is proxy to proxy improving the security?

On Saturday 15 May 2021 at 16:21:56, Jason Long wrote: > Hello, > Is proxy to proxy improving the security? For example: > > The Internet --> Reverse Proxy Server --> Reverse Proxy Server --> Web Site I would say that if the two reverse proxies, and the web server, are all running different

[users@httpd] Is proxy to proxy improving the security?

Hello, Is proxy to proxy improving the security? For example: The Internet --> Reverse Proxy Server --> Reverse Proxy Server --> Web Site Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional

Re: [users@httpd] Reverse proxy issue with Chrome

No, there is no further information: GET https://webserver1.com/ 502 (Proxy Error) favicon.ico:1 GET https://webserver1.com/favicon.ico 502 (Proxy Error) Andreas On 14.05.2021 17:00, Michael Wechner wrote: Does your Chrome console have some additional hints? Thanks Michael Am Fr., 14. Mai