Great thanks for your quick answer.
If I understand well setting LimitRequestLine 10240 in name based virtualhost ?
So what is your recommendation.
Anyway, thanks for the time already spent on this.
Regards
Florent THOMAS
☎ +33 972 457 755
✉ [ mailto:florent.tho...@mind-and-go.com |
OpenVPN port-share has nothing to do with which HTTP server is running
behind it. You should have a completely working Apache configuration
separate from anything connected to OpenVPN, then you can change the
listening port for HTTPD and have OpenVPN forward traffic to it.
The sites-enabled
Hello,The following article shows how to set up OpenVPN with Nginx:
https://snikt.net/blog/2016/12/01/how-not-to-hide-openvpn-behind-https/ssl/
I want to use Apache for this. Is /etc/nginx/sites-enabled/default equivalent
to /etc/apache2/httpd.conf?
Thank you.
>
>
>>
>> Is there any "permeability" between vhosts ? is there any precedence that
>> could cause this vhost to be considered as the "master" of some options?
>> Could anyone lead me to wha I am doing wrong?
>>
>
Yes, the "default vhost" for a set of name based hosts has its
configuration applied
The hostname, normally in the Host header, is not read until after the
request line. So it cannot be effectively set in name based vhosts.
The manual already warns about it
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024, 9:26 AM Florent Thomas
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm running :
> *Server version: Apache/2.4.57
Hi everyone,
I'm running :
Server version: Apache/2.4.57 (Debian)
Server built: 2023-04-13T03:26:51
Server's Module Magic Number: 20120211:127
Server loaded: APR 1.7.2, APR-UTIL 1.6.3, PCRE 10.42 2022-12-11
Compiled using: APR 1.7.2, APR-UTIL 1.6.3, PCRE 10.42 2022-12-11
Architecture:
At present, the LDAP credentials (if needed) have to be provided in
each stanza. Whilst the password can be obtained from a central source
by using the exec: function, this is not available for the DN. Any
changes to the DN will have to be made everywhere it appears.
Would it be worth adding
