On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 02:48:26PM -0400, George Adams wrote:
Joe, I just wanted to thank you again. The byterange patch you gave me
worked just beautifully.
Great, thanks for the feedback. I've proposed this for backport to the
2.0.x branch now so it should show up in a 2.0.x release
Joe Are these all simple static files, or is /out/ handled by some CGI
Joe script etc?
Joe, you're right - they do get passed through a Perl script for
processing. However, unless I'm mistaken, I don't THINK the following
code would produce the kind of problems I'm seeing:
OK, no, it's
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 12:12:05PM -0400, George Adams wrote:
Joe Are these all simple static files, or is /out/ handled by some CGI
Joe script etc?
Joe, you're right - they do get passed through a Perl script for
processing. However, unless I'm mistaken, I don't THINK the following
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:00:02AM -0400, George Adams wrote:
Thanks, Joe and Jon for your helpful thoughts regarding my Apache
memory problem. Here's some more information:
Joe 1-015823W 0.001742573500GET /out/388.mp3
Joe 2-0 15824 W 0.00 1742573499 GET /out/238.mp3
George,
I have something similar...
I have been debugging an issue where I have seen processes growing to 800Mb on
a forward proxy configuration using the worker model. Perhaps interestingly
on reverse proxy configurations I get 100% CPU states occasionally as well.
What I have noticed is
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:05:49AM -0400, George Adams wrote:
I have an Apache 2.0.54 server on a Gentoo Linux (2.6.11) box which has
1Gig RAM and an additional 1Gig swap space. The server handles a lot of
people downloading sermons from our church website (which are no larger
than 18Meg
I read an earlier thread on memory consumption (http://tinyurl.com/bly4d),
which may be related to my problem... but because of some differences, I'm
not so sure. Any help would be appreciated!
I have an Apache 2.0.54 server on a Gentoo Linux (2.6.11) box which has 1Gig
RAM and an additional
