Re: [users@httpd] Apache creates Semaphore

Hi Hemant, On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 6:13 AM, Hemant Chaudhary wrote: > > Yes kill -Term works for me even without patch of code. Good. > I have one more doubt, I checked with ipcs command that there is only entry > of semaphore and no entry in shared memory. > >

Re: [users@httpd] Proxying WebSockets + Event MPM

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 11:54 PM, Osama Elnaggar wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering if idle websocket connections still tie up a thread or not > when using the event MPM + proxy mode. According to this thread - >

Re: [users@httpd] Proxying WebSockets + Event MPM

Thank you. -- Osama Elnaggar On November 10, 2017 at 10:31:43 PM, Eric Covener (cove...@gmail.com) wrote: On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 11:54 PM, Osama Elnaggar wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering if idle websocket connections still tie up a thread or not > when using the event

Re: [users@httpd] Apache Reverse Proxy and NTLM Authentication Help!

Deanna, On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 3:17 AM, Deanna Stevenson wrote: > Thanks Yann. I am on ubuntu 16.04 and apache 2.4.8, and looks like the MPM > module I have right now is "event", which seems to be default for modern > OSs. It seems like in 2.4 I can load different MPM

[users@httpd] Apache 2.4 DoS?

Hi I am running old PHP under Apache httpd-2.4. During a typical day: Server load: 0.03 0.03 0.05 Total accesses: 16028 - Total Traffic: 1.4 GB CPU Usage: u20.92 s1.24 cu.01 cs.23 - .00163% CPU load .0116 requests/sec - 1104 B/second - 92.7 kB/request 2 requests currently being processed, 8

[users@httpd] decompressing gzipped response?

I'm using Apache HTTPClient 4.5.3 to make some HTTP requests, but I am getting a gzipped response back I have tried many things I found online but non of them worked. I still get gibberish when I print the response. Below are the relevant code. What do I need to do to get a human readable

Re: [users@httpd] yum update puts back removed Apache modules

yum doesn't know when you install a programme by compiling it that it is there unless you update the package history database, so it goes by it's previous record (the apache version that you superseded). There is a yum option to exclude specific packages from a yum update. I seem to recall

Re: [users@httpd] yum update puts back removed Apache modules

Oops, forgot to paste the link. It looks like you got the answer, but to complete my response here you go:  https://access.redhat.com/solutions/10185   Quoting pdou...@xmission.com: I have had to deal with this problem, usually due to updates that are unsupported by 3rd party apps. You can

[users@httpd] yum update puts back removed Apache modules

It seems as though “yum” update has replaced Apache modules installed in the default installation, that we had removed after the initial install because they weren’t used. Is there some way to prevent that from happening? thanks

Re: [users@httpd] yum update puts back removed Apache modules

Thanks John On 11/10/17, 4:38 PM, "John Iliffe" wrote: yum doesn't know when you install a programme by compiling it that it is there unless you update the package history database, so it goes by it's previous record (the apache version that you

Re: [users@httpd] yum update puts back removed Apache modules

I have had to deal with this problem, usually due to updates that are unsupported by 3rd party apps. You can exclude individual packages from your updates. I think this article should help.   Quoting "Rose, John B" : It seems as though “yum” update has replaced Apache

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4 DoS?

On 11/10/2017 12:41 PM, Douglas Duckworth wrote: > Hi > > I am running old PHP under Apache httpd-2.4. > > During a typical day: > > Server load: 0.03 0.03 0.05 > Total accesses: 16028 - Total Traffic: 1.4 GB > CPU Usage: u20.92 s1.24 cu.01 cs.23 - .00163% CPU load > .0116 requests/sec - 1104