Re: [users@httpd] Apache Timeouts, fastcgi, etc settings recommendations for Wordpress site servers?

2019-04-03 Thread Rose, John B
Yann


httpd-2.4.6-88.el7.x86_64



Thanks


From: Yann Ylavic 
Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 4:29:04 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache Timeouts, fastcgi, etc settings 
recommendations for Wordpress site servers?

Or better, the httpd-2.4.6 rpm version.

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 10:25 PM Yann Ylavic  wrote:
>
> Well, possibly, but then I need the Redhat version..
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 10:09 PM Rose, John B  wrote:
> >
> > 2.4.6 but that can be a bit misleading from what I understand if it is Red 
> > Hat. Apparently they piecemeal add the functionality of later versions of 
> > Apache if you can guess what it is
> >
> > 
> > From: Yann Ylavic 
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 4:02:15 PM
> > To: users@httpd.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache Timeouts, fastcgi, etc settings 
> > recommendations for Wordpress site servers?
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 8:38 PM Rose, John B  wrote:
> > >
> > > The result afterwards are a bunch of this type, until we reboot …
> > >
> > > [Mon Apr 01 14:26:45.998971 2019] [proxy_fcgi:error] [pid 26422:tid 
> > > 139964645857024] (70007)The timeout specified has expired: [client 
> > > xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:63031] AH01075: Error dispatching request to :, referer: 
> > > https://somesite.com/sub1/sub2/
> > >
> > >
> > > Linux
> > >
> > > Apache
> >
> > Which version of httpd are you running?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Yann.
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
> >

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org



Re: [users@httpd] Re: CVE-2019-0211 - Apache 2.2

2019-04-03 Thread Hajo Locke

Hello,

Am 03.04.2019 um 11:06 schrieb Rainer Canavan:

On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 10:18 AM LuKreme  wrote:

On Apr 3, 2019, at 02:05, Hajo Locke  wrote:

Is apache 2.2 exploitable by CVE-2019-0211 ?
Description says that first affected version is 2.4.17, but may be 2.2 was not 
analyzed.

“Apache HTTP Server 2.4 releases 2.4.17 to 2.4.38” seems clear.

Since Apache httpd 2.2 is not supported anymore, it is quite possible
that nobody has
checked if 2.2 is affected. However, it looks like redhat has checked
for their old
RHEL releases that ship with 2.2 and they appear to be unaffected:
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2019-0211

rainer

thanks Reiner,  i hoped but did not know that some LTS distribution
still supports 2.2


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org



Thanks,
Hajo


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org



Re: [users@httpd] Apache httpd 2.4.39 has a problem while rpmbuid

2019-04-03 Thread Yann Ylavic
Hi,

thanks for your feedbacks on each release!

On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 10:48 AM kohmoto  wrote:
>
> I found the following module statement was missing in httpd.spec.
> %{_libdir}/httpd/modules/mod_socache_redis.so

I just backported the change to 2.4.x (was trunk only so far), so it
will be in the next release.

Regards,
Yann.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org



Re: [users@httpd] Re: CVE-2019-0211 - Apache 2.2

2019-04-03 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 11:06 AM Rainer Canavan
 wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 10:18 AM LuKreme  wrote:
> >
> > On Apr 3, 2019, at 02:05, Hajo Locke  wrote:
> > > Is apache 2.2 exploitable by CVE-2019-0211 ?
> > > Description says that first affected version is 2.4.17, but may be 2.2 
> > > was not analyzed.
> >
> > “Apache HTTP Server 2.4 releases 2.4.17 to 2.4.38” seems clear.
>
> Since Apache httpd 2.2 is not supported anymore, it is quite possible
> that nobody has
> checked if 2.2 is affected. However, it looks like redhat has checked
> for their old
> RHEL releases that ship with 2.2 and they appear to be unaffected:
> https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2019-0211

Indeed, 2.2 is not affected... by this one.

Regards,
Yann.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org



Re: [users@httpd] Re: CVE-2019-0211 - Apache 2.2

2019-04-03 Thread Rainer Canavan
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 10:18 AM LuKreme  wrote:
>
> On Apr 3, 2019, at 02:05, Hajo Locke  wrote:
> > Is apache 2.2 exploitable by CVE-2019-0211 ?
> > Description says that first affected version is 2.4.17, but may be 2.2 was 
> > not analyzed.
>
> “Apache HTTP Server 2.4 releases 2.4.17 to 2.4.38” seems clear.

Since Apache httpd 2.2 is not supported anymore, it is quite possible
that nobody has
checked if 2.2 is affected. However, it looks like redhat has checked
for their old
RHEL releases that ship with 2.2 and they appear to be unaffected:
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2019-0211

rainer

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org



[users@httpd] Apache httpd 2.4.39 has a problem while rpmbuid

2019-04-03 Thread kohmoto

Hi,

Platform:

    CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 (Core)
    kernel version: 3.10.0-957.10.1.el7.x86_64

I met a trouble during rpmbuild.

RPM buid error:
A installed, but not contained in the package ,file was found:
(The message was given in Japanese, so the above text was translated one.)
   /usr/lib64/httpd/modules/mod_socache_redis.so

I found the following module statement was missing in httpd.spec.
%{_libdir}/httpd/modules/mod_socache_redis.so

Then, I could rpmbuild successfully using the changed spec file with the 
above line.


Thank you all contributors to this project for this important update.

Thank you.

Yours truly,
Kazuhiko Kohmoto



[users@httpd] Re: CVE-2019-0211 - Apache 2.2

2019-04-03 Thread LuKreme
On Apr 3, 2019, at 02:05, Hajo Locke  wrote:
> Is apache 2.2 exploitable by CVE-2019-0211 ?
> Description says that first affected version is 2.4.17, but may be 2.2 was 
> not analyzed.

“Apache HTTP Server 2.4 releases 2.4.17 to 2.4.38” seems clear.

-- 
My main job is trying to come up with new and innovative and effective ways to 
reject even more mail. I'm up to about 97% now.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org



[users@httpd] CVE-2019-0211 - Apache 2.2

2019-04-03 Thread Hajo Locke

Hello,

i have still a bunch of apache 2.2 servers. ;(
Is apache 2.2 exploitable by CVE-2019-0211 ?
Description says that first affected version is 2.4.17, but may be 2.2
was not analyzed.

Thanks,
Hajo