[us...@httpd] recommended setup apache/php

Hello List, iam looking for most recommendend setup of apache/php for my purposes. I want to provide dynamical webspace for some users and there moderate volume pages. I know apache in combination with mod_php is fastest setup but i want to avoid mod_php for some reasons. Could imagine a

[us...@httpd] Re: recommended setup apache/php

PHP in CGI mode consumes lot of memory because, for every request a PHP interpreter is called up, so your memory is filled with N php interpreters executing the same PHP code where N is the number of online users. There is no way to avoid it except using some different method like

[us...@httpd] Re: recommended setup apache/php

On 2010-07-27 10:15, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: If I understood your question properly, you're asking that /htdocs/a.php is one fastcgi app and /htdocs/b.php is another. If you want it this way, then you will have to add the shebang (#!) line to all of your scripts before ?php starts, which is

[us...@httpd] mod_dav - practical use

Hello List, a question to mod_dav. Some providers offer mod_dav to edit files which are also editable/writeable by ftp-user? In most cases ftp-users/apacheuser are different to avoid security problems. Whats the trick to make this possible without security risk? could imagine a special

[us...@httpd] Re: mod_dav - practical use

It's not so much a trick.. You reverse-proxy DAV (write) requests to a back-end which is running on an unprivileged port, as an unprivileged user, who has the permission to do writes on the FS. ahh, sure... but i would need a new backend for every dav user. which software is recommend for

[us...@httpd] Re: mod_dav - practical use

Thanks for your help. The obvious answer, of course, is to run httpd ;) may be i misunderstood something... at first line is apache which redirects dav-requests coming on special port or alias by reverse-proxy to a backend which is able to read/write within users folder (doing the dav-stuff

[us...@httpd] Re: mod_dav - practical use

Hello, http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/ExtendingPrivilegeSeparation ahh,thanks a lot for your help. now i can go on... Thanks, Hajo - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See

[us...@httpd] webdav antivir

Hello, would like to activate virus scanning and block uploads for my webdav clients. Is there a practicable way to do this? is someone using mod_clamav for apache? http://software.othello.ch/mod_clamav/ seems to be not very up to date. last version from 2009. are there other solutions

[users@httpd] ssl-vhost-mixing issue

Apache 2.2.14 Hello List, have a question to ssl and two vhosts. i have 2 ip-based vhosts for enabling ssl for one domain in httpd.conf VirtualHost ip1.ip1.ip1.ip1:443 Servername example.com SSLCertificateFile crt1 /VirtualHost VirtualHost ip2.ip2.ip2.ip2:443 Servername example.com

[users@httpd] Re: ssl-vhost-mixing issue

Hello, Apache 2.2.14 Hello List, have a question to ssl and two vhosts. i have 2 ip-based vhosts for enabling ssl for one domain in httpd.conf VirtualHost ip1.ip1.ip1.ip1:443 Servername example.com SSLCertificateFile crt1 /VirtualHost VirtualHost ip2.ip2.ip2.ip2:443

[users@httpd] Re: ssl-vhost-mixing issue

Hello, Krist wrote: You don't have a NameVirtualHost directive? What happens if you enter https://ip2.ip2.ip2.ip2 in your browser? we use NameVirtualHost *:80 in httpd.conf I did some tests with setting NameVirtualHost to base-ip of the server ip0.ip0.ip0.ip0, but nothing changed. ip1

Re: [users@httpd] Re: ssl-vhost-mixing issue

See https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43218#c5 It will work if you use a different ServerName (even varying the port would fix it) in the vhost with a different cert. Regards, Joe ahh, a bug. changing port to non-standard would solve this problem but cause others... i

[users@httpd] loadbalancing apache/tomcat

Hello List, following situation: i have 1 apache which is connected by mod_jk to multiple tomcat servers. Now it seems to get necessary that i also need to balance the apache-applications. What is best practice in my case? I think about nginx in first line which is connected to apache-servers

[users@httpd] reload separate fcgid-application

Hello, is there a possibility to reload a separate fcgid-application (mod_fcgid) if something has changed? May be the php.ini for my wrapper-script has changed and i want to reload this application for vhost without disturbing other apps. Is this possible? I think a reload of apache stops all

Re: [users@httpd] reload separate fcgid-application

I am not very familiar with mod_fcgid, but hat you want is possible with what I am running: httpd 2.3.12-dev with mod_proxy_fcgi PHP 5.3.7-dev with php-fpm interesting, but not an option for productive systems. the killing of user-processes, like suggested by Björn, also isnt a nice solution

Re: [users@httpd] reload separate fcgid-application

Hello, You could issue a kill pid of your fcgi-wrapper process that handles your specific vhost (i distinguish mine through the use of different users via suexec, so i can do a pkill -u username), apache will spawn a new process when it recieves the next request. However, note that this is

[users@httpd] keepalivetimeout - odd behaviour

Apache 2.2.14 Hello, try to linkcheck my domain with http://validator.w3.org/checklink The linkchecker tells in some cases that my server would answer with 500: Error: 500 Server closed connection without sending any data back All i see in Log is no error but successful request to /robots.txt

[users@httpd] mod_status, disable server-status for users

Hello List, ist there any possibility to hide server-status page provided by mod-status for my users? every user with .htaccess is able to use sethandler and able to view complete status. how to disable this? Thanks, Hajo

Re: [users@httpd] mod_status, disable server-status for users

hello, I'm afraid the only way to disable this is to disable mod_status. I don't know of any other way and I that's why I don't use mod_status. which module you are using? i cant renounce to view a statuspage of my server. Thanks, Hans

[users@httpd] german umlauts in filename

Hello List, i have some files with german umlauts ö ä ü in filename and want to request them by http. filename is coded in latin1, in console/ftp etc. all works well and looks good. when requesting file ü.txt i see this error in log: File does not exist: \xc3\xbc.txt It just works if i

Re: [users@httpd] german umlauts in filename

Use links that are URL-encoded with the proper bytes so clients don't have to choose the codepage to request in. hmm, but when typing url directly in browser in most cases utf8 is used by browser. how to solve this? Thanks, Hajo

Re: [users@httpd] german umlauts in filename

You could try rewriting utf-8 representation of umlaut [or other common char people type into the URL directly] into your local codepage representation. this works. is not my preferred solution for this but it works for now. i will fix my ftp-server to store filenames utf8 Thanks, Hajo

[users@httpd] filesmatch suspends AccessFileName?

Hello, interesting thing here. Ist this a bug or expected? Apache is 2.2.23 Costumer uses .htaccess which uses some SetEnvIfNoCase Directives to filter bad bots. the allow,deny directive is placed within a filesmatch directive. example: SetEnvIfNoCase user-agent hallohallo bad_bot=1

[users@httpd] Re: filesmatch suspends AccessFileName?

Hello, I have the following in the httpd.conf: FilesMatch ^\.ht Order allow,deny Deny from all Satisfy All /FilesMatch Don't you have something similar? i have this: Files ~ ^\.ht Order allow,deny Deny from all /Files but this is overwritten by the .htaccess of

[users@httpd] strange 32bit apache-problem

Hello, one of my machines i upgraded tu ubuntu 14.04 32bit. there is a apache 2.2.27 running on it (non ubuntu-repo). i have a textfile which is 512byte long, it contains just some chars, just one long line with a linebreak at the end. If i request this file by wget from the same machine, all

Re: [users@httpd] strange 32bit apache-problem

Hello, Am 15.09.2014 um 11:57 schrieb Fiedler Roman: Hi, Von: Hajo Locke [mailto:hajo.lo...@gmx.de] Hello, one of my machines i upgraded tu ubuntu 14.04 32bit. there is a apache 2.2.27 running on it (non ubuntu-repo). i have a textfile which is 512byte long, it contains just some chars

Re: [users@httpd] strange 32bit apache-problem

Hello, Am 15.09.2014 um 13:51 schrieb Eric Covener: On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 5:30 AM, Hajo Locke hajo.lo...@gmx.de wrote: If i request this file by wget from the same machine, all is looking fine and readable. If i request this file from a other machine, then file seems to be corrupted

Re: [users@httpd] strange 32bit apache-problem

Hello, Am 15.09.2014 um 13:51 schrieb Eric Covener: On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 5:30 AM, Hajo Locke hajo.lo...@gmx.de wrote: If i request this file by wget from the same machine, all is looking fine and readable. If i request this file from a other machine, then file seems to be corrupted

[users@httpd] mod_rewrite vs. mod_jk

Hello, i have a small mod_jk.conf and want to use mod_rewrite also: JkMount /* ajp13 JkUnmount /test/* ajp13 RewriteEngine On RewriteRule ^/$ /java_app/ [L] Rewriting by mod_rewrite only works with urls which are unmounted by JkUnmount. So above Rule is not working because its immediately

[users@httpd] spdy/http/2 and mod_php

Hello, iam planning to upgrade my apache2.2 to 2.4., i have 2 questions before where i need your help. former SPDY Implementation conflicts with non-threadsafe Moduls like mod_php. To use SPDY it is necessary to use worker-mpm and php-cgi. Now HTTP/2 is new standard and i would like to know

[users@httpd] unexpected behaviour of default host

Hello List, used for years apache 2.2, now trying to upgrade to 2.4 and do some configtests. I noticed an unexpected behaviour of default host. like suggested here, i use a minimal default vhost: https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/vhosts/examples.html

Re: [users@httpd] unexpected behaviour of default host

Am 29.12.2015 um 20:07 schrieb Eric Covener: On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Hajo Locke <hajo.lo...@gmx.de> wrote: In Apache 2.2 we used additional "Servername *", but with 2.4 it is not allowed to use wildcards with Servername-Directive. I think it was treated as a litera

[users@httpd] apache 2.4 handling of subdomains with unallowed characters

Hello list, i have some subdomains with unallowed characters, in my case the underscore. In apache 2.2 subdomains like this worked: sub_domain.domain.com In apache 2.4 this produces a 400 servererror (bad request) It seems that apache 2.4's handling of allowed/not allowed chars is more

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.4 handling of subdomains with unallowed characters

Hello, Am 24.01.2017 um 07:01 schrieb Nick Kew: On Mon, 2017-01-23 at 21:26 +, Darryl Philip Baker wrote: DNS doesn’t allow underscore in host and domain names so how a URL with an underscore would have ever worked is beyond me. Yeah, but is it the webserver's role to enforce that? Old

[users@httpd] apache 2.4 wildcardsubdomains

Hello List, in apache 2.2 we had a typical vhost like this to realize wildcardsubdomains: ServerName *.example.com ServerAlias *.example.com DocumentRoot /var/www/wildcardexample/public_html In apache 2.4 wildcards are not allowed in servername. Is it ok to just comment out servername and

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.4 wildcardsubdomains

36 GMT+02:00 Hajo Locke <hajo.lo...@gmx.de <mailto:hajo.lo...@gmx.de>>: Hello List, in apache 2.2 we had a typical vhost like this to realize wildcardsubdomains: ServerName *.example.com <http://example.com> ServerAlias *.example.com <http://examp

Re: [users@httpd] HTTPD 2.4.25 crash in mod_proxy (ajp)

Hello list, sorry guys. i think i have lost overview. Has this resulted in a public patch? Thanks, Hajo Am 23.12.2016 um 13:18 schrieb Konstantin Kolinko: BCC: Steffen I did quick tests to verify whether shutdown issues are related to mod_proxy. They are not related. 2016-12-23 15:01

Re: [users@httpd] HTTPD 2.4.25 crash in mod_proxy (ajp)

Hello, Am 02.01.2017 um 12:47 schrieb Yann Ylavic: On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Yann Ylavic <ylavic@gmail.com> wrote: On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Yann Ylavic <ylavic@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Hajo, On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Hajo Locke <hajo.lo...@gmx.de>

[users@httpd] http/2 Misdirected Request

Apache 2.4.25 Hello, have an issue with http/2 and response "421 Misdirected Request". I read this to inform about issues with multiple hosts and same certificate. https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_http2.html Unfortunately i can't solve my problem on my own. Involved are to subdomains

Re: [users@httpd] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache HTTP Server 2.4.27 Released

Hello, Am 11.07.2017 um 15:58 schrieb Eric Covener: On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:41 AM, David Copeland wrote: o HTTP/2 will not be negotiated when using the Prefork MPM I'm wondering what the reason for this is? In the previous release, HTTP2 made prefork run

Re: [users@httpd] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache HTTP Server 2.4.27 Released

Hello, Am 11.07.2017 um 16:08 schrieb David Copeland: On 11/07/17 09:58 AM, Eric Covener wrote: On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:41 AM, David Copeland wrote: o HTTP/2 will not be negotiated when using the Prefork MPM I'm wondering what the reason for this is? In the

[users@httpd] apache 2.4 includes vi .swp files

Hello, found an interesting difference between include behaviour of apache 2.2 and 2.4 Have an include in apache2.conf: Include /etc/apache2/conf.d/ When editing a conf file in this folder by vi, vi creates a new swp file. lets say i edit a file logging.conf, so vi creates a file

[users@httpd] http/2 vs. Headername

Apache 2.4.25 Hello, i have a small .htaccess with following content to view Foldercontents: ### Options +Indexes Headername /foo/bar.htm ### This is working by http, but fails in https if browser uses http/2. Chrome Message: ERR_SPDY_PROTOCOL_ERROR Firefox: Secure Connection Failed I dont see

Re: [users@httpd] http/2 vs. Headername

m 09:22 schrieb Hajo Locke: Apache 2.4.25 Hello, i have a small .htaccess with following content to view Foldercontents: ### Options +Indexes Headername /foo/bar.htm ### This is working by http, but fails in https if browser uses http/2. Chrome Message: ERR_SPDY_PROTOCOL_ERROR Firefox: Secure Co

Re: [users@httpd] http/2 vs. Headername

ersion which is officially released. Thanks, Hajo Am 23.05.2017 um 11:36 schrieb Luca Toscano: Hi Hajo, any chance that you could download/build/test the latest release of https://github.com/icing/mod_h2/releases ? Luca 2017-05-23 11:30 GMT+02:00 Hajo Locke <hajo.lo...@gmx.de <ma

[users@httpd] Configuration help - addhandler <> mod_proxy_fcgi

Hello List, currently i use classic mod_fastcgi (fastcgiexternalserver) with php-fpm, which is quite reliable. A disadvantage of this setup is, that not every response-header set by .htaccess will really send to client. Something like this is the current setup:     AddHandler myphp-cgi .php

Re: [users@httpd] Configuration help - addhandler <> mod_proxy_fcgi

Hello, Am 11.09.2017 um 14:58 schrieb Eric Covener: On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Hajo Locke <hajo.lo...@gmx.de> wrote: Hello List, currently i use classic mod_fastcgi (fastcgiexternalserver) with php-fpm, which is quite reliable. A disadvantage of this setup is, that not every re

[users@httpd] high count h2 idle streams

Hello List, found today an abnormality in my apachestatus for some servers. There are a lot of "h2  idle, streams" in apachestatus. This looks like this: 14-0 28241 0/41/41 K  0.25 128 1 0.0 0.10 0.10  ip.ip.ip.ip h2 idle, streams: 0/0/0/0/0 (open/recv/resp/push/rst) 15-0 28242 0/11/11 K 

Re: [users@httpd] high count h2 idle streams

Hello, Am 09.10.2017 um 12:33 schrieb Hajo Locke: Hello List, found today an abnormality in my apachestatus for some servers. There are a lot of "h2  idle, streams" in apachestatus. This looks like this: 14-0 28241 0/41/41 K  0.25 128 1 0.0 0.10 0.10  ip.ip.ip.ip h2 idle, stream

Re: [users@httpd] problems benchmarking php-fpm/proxy_fcgi with h2load

01.2018 um 12:45 schrieb Daniel: which are the results exactly and which are the results to a non-php file such as a gif or similar? 2018-01-19 12:38 GMT+01:00 Hajo Locke <hajo.lo...@gmx.de>: Hello list, i do some http/2 benchmarks on my machine and have problems to finish at least o

[users@httpd] problems benchmarking php-fpm/proxy_fcgi with h2load

Hello list, i do some http/2 benchmarks on my machine and have problems to finish at least one test. System is Ubuntu16.04, libnghttp2-14 1.7.1, Apache 2.4.29, mpm_event I start h2load with standard-params: h2load  -n10 -c100 -m10 https://example.com/phpinfo.php first steps are really

[users@httpd] h2load http/2 benchmarkingresults using different mpm/php configurations

Hello List, separatly from other mail with proxy_fcgi/enablereuse problem i want to tell about my results. This is quite interesting. System is Ubuntu16.04, libnghttp2-14 1.7.1, Apache 2.4.29, php 7.0.25 All tests were startet with this params: h2load  -n10 -c100 -m10

Re: [users@httpd] problems benchmarking php-fpm/proxy_fcgi with h2load

Hello, Am 19.01.2018 um 15:48 schrieb Luca Toscano: Hi Hajo, 2018-01-19 13:23 GMT+01:00 Hajo Locke <hajo.lo...@gmx.de <mailto:hajo.lo...@gmx.de>>: Hello, thanks Daniel and Stefan. This is a good point. I did the test with a static file and this test was successfu

Re: [users@httpd] proxy_fcgi - force flush to client

Hello Luca, Am 01.02.2018 um 09:10 schrieb Hajo Locke: Hello Luca, Am 01.02.2018 um 04:46 schrieb Luca Toscano: Hi Hajo, 2018-01-31 1:27 GMT-08:00 Hajo Locke <hajo.lo...@gmx.de <mailto:hajo.lo...@gmx.de>>: Hello List, currently i compare features and behaviour o

Re: [users@httpd] proxy_fcgi - force flush to client

Am 02.02.2018 um 07:05 schrieb Luca Toscano: Hello Hajo, 2018-02-01 13:20 GMT+01:00 Hajo Locke <hajo.lo...@gmx.de <mailto:hajo.lo...@gmx.de>>: Hello Luca, Am 01.02.2018 um 09:10 schrieb Hajo Locke: Hello Luca, Am 01.02.2018 um 04:46 schrieb Luca Toscano:

[users@httpd] minimal custom modul with no functionality

Hello List, i try to remove mod_php and switch to php-cgi with proxy_fcgi and mpm_event. An example setup is running well.  But by removing libphp7.so i want to keep support for php_value/php_flag directives  in .htaccess This is done by php-htscanner extension. But for a working php-htscanner

Re: [users@httpd] problems benchmarking php-fpm/proxy_fcgi with h2load

Hello Luca, Am 05.02.2018 um 02:27 schrieb Luca Toscano: Hi Hajo, 2018-02-01 3:58 GMT+01:00 Luca Toscano <toscano.l...@gmail.com <mailto:toscano.l...@gmail.com>>: Hi Hajo, 2018-01-31 2:37 GMT-08:00 Hajo Locke <hajo.lo...@gmx.de <mailto:hajo.lo...@gmx.de

[users@httpd] proxy_fcgi - force flush to client

Hello List, currently i compare features and behaviour of proxy_fcgi to classical methods like mod_fastcgi/mod_php. mod_php/fastcgi have options to send every output from backend immediately to client. So it is possible to see progressing output in browser and not complete websiteoutput at

Re: [users@httpd] minimal custom modul with no functionality

Hello List, Am 29.01.2018 um 11:32 schrieb Hajo Locke: Hello List, i try to remove mod_php and switch to php-cgi with proxy_fcgi and mpm_event. An example setup is running well.  But by removing libphp7.so i want to keep support for php_value/php_flag directives  in .htaccess This is done

Re: [users@httpd] problems benchmarking php-fpm/proxy_fcgi with h2load

Hello, Am 22.01.2018 um 11:54 schrieb Hajo Locke: Hello, Am 19.01.2018 um 15:48 schrieb Luca Toscano: Hi Hajo, 2018-01-19 13:23 GMT+01:00 Hajo Locke <hajo.lo...@gmx.de <mailto:hajo.lo...@gmx.de>>: Hello, thanks Daniel and Stefan. This is a good point. I

Re: [users@httpd] proxy_fcgi - force flush to client

Hello Luca, Am 01.02.2018 um 04:46 schrieb Luca Toscano: Hi Hajo, 2018-01-31 1:27 GMT-08:00 Hajo Locke <hajo.lo...@gmx.de <mailto:hajo.lo...@gmx.de>>: Hello List, currently i compare features and behaviour of proxy_fcgi to classical methods like mod_fas

Re: [users@httpd] proxy_fcgi - force flush to client

Hello, Am 08.02.2018 um 19:33 schrieb Luca Toscano: 2018-02-02 12:20 GMT+01:00 Hajo Locke <hajo.lo...@gmx.de <mailto:hajo.lo...@gmx.de>>: Am 02.02.2018 um 07:05 schrieb Luca Toscano: Hello Hajo, 2018-02-01 13:20 GMT+01:00 Hajo Locke <hajo.lo...@gmx.de

Re: [users@httpd] proxy_fcgi - force flush to client

Hello, Am 19.02.2018 um 10:11 schrieb Hajo Locke: Hello, Am 08.02.2018 um 19:33 schrieb Luca Toscano: 2018-02-02 12:20 GMT+01:00 Hajo Locke <hajo.lo...@gmx.de <mailto:hajo.lo...@gmx.de>>: Am 02.02.2018 um 07:05 schrieb Luca Toscano: Hello Hajo, 2018-02-01 13:

Re: [users@httpd] Configuration help - addhandler <> mod_proxy_fcgi

Hello, Am 08.03.2018 um 08:54 schrieb Hajo Locke: Hello, Am 11.09.2017 um 14:58 schrieb Eric Covener: On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Hajo Locke wrote: Hello List, currently i use classic mod_fastcgi (fastcgiexternalserver) with php-fpm, which is quite reliable. A disadvantage

Re: [users@httpd] h2load http/2 benchmarkingresults using different mpm/php configurations

Am 22.01.2018 um 14:38 schrieb Eric Covener: but i never expected that my winner in this test is mod_php. also there was lowest loadavg. I don't think the motivations to pull the PHP interpreter out of the webserver process is performance -- that's one of the costs. yes. my statement was

Re: [users@httpd] Configuration help - addhandler <> mod_proxy_fcgi

Hello, Am 11.09.2017 um 14:58 schrieb Eric Covener: On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Hajo Locke <hajo.lo...@gmx.de> wrote: Hello List, currently i use classic mod_fastcgi (fastcgiexternalserver) with php-fpm, which is quite reliable. A disadvantage of this setup is, that not every re

[users@httpd] define variables by vhost only

Hello List, iam looking for a way to use define to create variables limited to vhosts (apache 2.4). Currently i have some vhosts and use this syntax: define myvar mycontent. Name of variables is in all vhosts the same, "mycontent" is different and vhost related. Later i use this variable in

Re: [users@httpd] define variables by vhost only

Hello, thanks, for your answer. Am 05.11.2018 um 13:54 schrieb David Spector: Just in case it wasn't obvious, the message I just sent assumes that your server is managed by WHM/cPanel. If not, just use Include directives in your conf file. sorry, i dont understand. Is this a documented

Re: [users@httpd] define variables by vhost only

ov 5, 2018 at 9:43 AM Hajo Locke <mailto:hajo.lo...@gmx.de>> wrote: Hello List, iam looking for a way to use define to create variables limited to vhosts (apache 2.4). Currently i have some vhosts and use this syntax: define myvar mycontent. Name of variabl

Re: [users@httpd] ErrorDocument with URL containing URL encoded chars

Hello, Am 09.01.2019 um 09:48 schrieb Hajo Locke: Hello List, have a interesting problem here. I have a .htaccess with Errordocument containing Text to be displayed: ErrorDocument 404 "not existing" This works with standard URLs like http://example.com/fubar.htm I get re

[users@httpd] ErrorDocument with URL containing URL encoded chars

Hello List, have a interesting problem here. I have a .htaccess with Errordocument containing Text to be displayed: ErrorDocument 404 "not existing" This works with standard URLs like http://example.com/fubar.htm I get response 404 and in Browser displayed text is correct. Now i try URLs like

[users@httpd] CVE-2019-0211 - Apache 2.2

Hello, i have still a bunch of apache 2.2 servers. ;( Is apache 2.2 exploitable by CVE-2019-0211 ? Description says that first affected version is 2.4.17, but may be 2.2 was not analyzed. Thanks, Hajo

Re: [users@httpd] Re: CVE-2019-0211 - Apache 2.2

Hello, Am 03.04.2019 um 11:06 schrieb Rainer Canavan: On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 10:18 AM LuKreme wrote: On Apr 3, 2019, at 02:05, Hajo Locke wrote: Is apache 2.2 exploitable by CVE-2019-0211 ? Description says that first affected version is 2.4.17, but may be 2.2 was not analyzed. “Apache

Re: [users@httpd] Re: HTTP Method Patch

Hello, Am 21.02.2019 um 05:29 schrieb Christophe JAILLET: Le 20/02/2019 à 14:58, Hajo Locke a écrit : Hello list, this is Apache 2.4.34 I was asked if Apache is supporting HTTP Request Methode PATCH. To be honest i did not really found something useful in the web. Is Apache supporting

[users@httpd] HTTP Method Patch

Hello list, this is Apache 2.4.34 I was asked if Apache is supporting HTTP Request Methode PATCH. To be honest i did not really found something useful in the web. Is Apache supporting this method and is an additionally modul required? Iam not aware of allowing or forbidding PATCH in httpd.conf

[users@httpd] how to put geodata into $_SERVER for php-fpm using proxy_fcgid

Hello List, we use latest apache 2.4.39 and various php-version connected with proxy_fcgid. previously we used mod_fastcgi to bind php-fpm to apache.  Watching a phpinfo() in this scenario offered also complete geodata section in phpinfo. mod_geoip ist installed and mod_fastcgi put this into

Re: [users@httpd] Fwd: Apache 2.4.39 update for Ubuntu 14.04

Hello, Am 15.05.2019 um 13:43 schrieb Frank Gingras: Nitin, You will need to ask the folks that maintain your distribution/repository for help with updated packages. On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 01:18, Nitin Kadam mailto:nitinkadam1...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hello Team, I have ubuntu 14.04 web

[users@httpd] ssl stapling error - sectigo

Hello List, Apache is 2.4.39, System is Ubuntu 18.04 and 16.04 since yesterday evening we have massive mod_ssl problems with ssl stapling: Apr 24 11:20:59 myhostname apache2[16094]: [ssl:error] [pid 16094] AH01941: stapling_renew_response: responder error We had complaints about slow

Re: [users@httpd] ssl stapling error - sectigo

Hello, Am 25.04.2019 um 09:51 schrieb Stefan Eissing: Am 24.04.2019 um 16:22 schrieb Hajo Locke : Hello List, Apache is 2.4.39, System is Ubuntu 18.04 and 16.04 since yesterday evening we have massive mod_ssl problems with ssl stapling: Apr 24 11:20:59 myhostname apache2[16094

Re: [users@httpd] ssl stapling error - sectigo

be happy to have a fix in this case ;) Thanks, Hajo Am 25.04.2019 um 11:43 schrieb Hajo Locke: Hello, Am 25.04.2019 um 09:51 schrieb Stefan Eissing: Am 24.04.2019 um 16:22 schrieb Hajo Locke : Hello List, Apache is 2.4.39, System is Ubuntu 18.04 and 16.04 since yesterday evening we have