Hi Robert,
If you build an ssh tunnel, with pty-redir, you can create a
point-to-point tunnel, capable of all transports.
I use it a my self and for me it works just fine.
Hope it helps.
Kind regards,
Ed
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 09:58 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am looking for a tunneling
Hi Daniel,
If it was just two ipv4 networks over an ipv6 backbone, you could use
SSH tunneling.
(http://freshmeat.net/projects/pty-redir/)
If there are more then two ipv4 networks you could setup a
concentrator as a tunnel endpoint for all your tunnels and route ipv4
traffic over the ipv6
Hi Volker,
I am missing the mask you use for the various networks.
i think you would get it to work with a setup like this:
A has Ipv6-Address 2001:1::1
B has Ipv6-Address 2001:2::1
C has Ipv6-Address 2001:3::1
and a /64 mask
I think in your setup al ip addresses are in the same subnet, so
You can take your dumpfile and analyze it with ethereal.
I am not sure if it will show exactly what you want but it has a really rich
set of protocol decoders onboard.
You might want to try that.
Good luck,
@
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 16:27, Steven Latre wrote:
Hi again,
Sorry that I'm
Hi Sharmila,
I am not sure i can anwer all your questions, but i think i can answer some of
them.
I have a working ipv6 dns server running, so i will cut and paste from it.
in named.conf i have: (leaving out the irelevant parts)
listen-on-v6 { any; };
allow-query { any; };
zone
Hi Wong,
As far as i can see it looks fine, but there are a bit to many unreachables
for my taste. but nevermind about that.
I would rather see the output of ip route show . just the normal ipv4 route
table.
Does the trace ever work, or does it always fail?
does it always fail at the same
It looks like your internet conection is lost somehow.
The lookup starts at root level, then finds a server in the GTLD domain and
then nothing . strange.
Are there any specific routes you defined? ( mail the ouput of ip route show
please)
Does the trace always ends in failure or does
Hi Mike,
Did you try ssh port forwarding? ssh is ipv6 capable and might just do
what you want.
good luck,
@
I'm looking for an application that will open a listening v6 socket
and open a v4 socket to a pre-defined remote host/port. The
application would pass all input data from the v6 client
Hi Pedro,
I cut and paste some of your output and comment in between
AP stuff:
result of ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:01:29:D0:8B:59
inet addr:172.20.72.4 Bcast:172.20.255.255
Mask:255.255.255.0
You ipv4 netmask and broadcast are not correct. this has nothing to
Hi Lawrence,
I can't give you answers to all your questions, but to tell a (linux/unix)
host which DNS server to use, you would enter the ipv6 address in the
/etc/resolv.conf file.
And then i doesn't matter if the DNS server is on a different subnet, as
long as you can route traffic to that
Hi Mike,
If you use a tunnel to connect to ipv6 land i would expect that you ping6
tun0/sit0 or the other end of the tunnel, not your eth0 interface.
If you are using a tunnel, eth0 should only have an ipv4 address, not a
ipv6 address.
Hope this helps.
Kind rgards,
@
Forwarding is turned on.
somewhere and send a link to the list.
Kind regards,
@
On Friday 18 March 2005 15:17, Bellino, Phil wrote:
Ed,
eth0 can(and does) have the autoconfigured Native Link-Local address
fe80:..... address.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Kapitein [mailto
Well, with ipv6 there is no need to NAT anymore, you have plenty of addresses
to chooce from.
Your hosts wil have two addresses, 1 for ipv4 (10.0.10.x) and one for ipv6
2001:a:b::x
routing to ipv6 land will be done using the 2001:a:b::x and routing to ipv4
land will be done by the 10.0.10.x
13 matches
Mail list logo
