Re: mysql error when upgrade from 1.8 to 1.10

We actively use Apache Isis with HSQLDB, PostgreSQL and MS SQL Server and they all support separate schemas within the same database. I would like to see Apache Isis run without issues in the scenario you have but I don't want to lose the security that database schemas provide in preventing

Re: mysql error when upgrade from 1.8 to 1.10

Hi Jeroen and Stephen, Thanks for your response. Jeroen ,your solution may not fit my scenario. I run 3 instance of this system but all 3 databases on one server .(eg. db1,db2,db3) Each instance has username/password separately.(eg, user1, user2, user3) If create schema on this server , all

Re: RO calls authentication

Thank you Joan. I followed the link you posted in Github but got an access error 404 , is it a private repository? Cesar De: johandoornen...@filternet.nl Enviado: sábado, 14 de noviembre de 2015 04:21:48 a. m. Para:

Re: Does ISIS make following "rich domain model" pattern easier?

Thanks Dan for this comprehensive reply.  Regards,David. On Monday, 16 November 2015 8:48 PM, Dan Haywood wrote: On 15 November 2015 at 20:30, David Tildesley wrote: Hi All, I am looking for reasons why Apache ISIS framework

Re: Does ISIS make following "rich domain model" pattern easier?

Yes, the idea of constraints giving a system specific features (boosting some, diminishing others) is interesting, the main subject of Roy Fielding's PhD. If the essence of DDD is ubiquitous language, then UML definitely adds nothing because its a distraction when trying to communicate with

Re: Does ISIS make following "rich domain model" pattern easier?

Thanks Stephen, Certainly the intention of DDD is to make it easier for a development team to focus on a  "rich domain model" and therefore OO design principles. I agree Naked Objects approach facilitates the focusing on the domain model as an intention. And so both DDD and Naked Objects have

Re: moving to 1.10.0

On 12 November 2015 at 08:07, Stephen Cameron wrote: > So yes, it was something silly on my part. I had the getApplicationTenancy > method behaving as a property getter and it should (I guess) have been > marked as @Programmatic. Adding that annotation has fixed the

Re: Thinking about re-introducing UML in our workflow

Hi Jeroen, My experience is similar. I was always suspicious of the "code generation " approach, inevitably gives 2 "sources" that get out of step. The only good exception I saw was TogetherJ where "the code is the model" Best Regards Mike Burton (Sent from my iPhone) > On 15 Nov 2015, at

mysql error when upgrade from 1.8 to 1.10

Hi, I create a new 1.10 simple app and copy all code from 1.8 to 1.10. And made some change to fit new 1.10 specs. When start system , Eclipse show errors on console box. It seems each addon module occur one error. Below is one of errors: Unable to create schema

Re: Thinking about re-introducing UML in our workflow

Hi all. First of all, the good news for all romantics: Together is still alive !!! See [1]. [2] says it fully supports Eclipse. Really interesting, Jeroen, introducing Lombok. Look how clear and concise is the Aggregate in [3] expressed in C#. For me, my immediate need is to have a visual

Re: Thinking about re-introducing UML in our workflow

For you to know. I was just reading about “AgileJ” [1] (the video at [2] is excellent. It perfectly summarizes the points-of-view expressed here about the evolution last years of UML usage in dev teams). But I’ve also found the Papyrus Eclipse project [3]. Seems to be really alive (there has