RE: Consult about Apache ISIS

Hi Jose. I'm Sandas GRC (ElevenPaths product) technical leader. ElevenPaths is a Telefonica Company and we are pleased to use Apache ISIS on our product as our framework for three years. In Apache ISIS you have info about products that are developed with Apache ISIS.

RE: Multiple build problems on simpleapp-archetype on Java 1.7

Hi everyone. I rescue this thread because I have some issue running with Java 1.7 The problem exists since' ISIS-993: when normalize, bind actions to properties or field sets (if metadata not already specified as an annotation). (Commit id: e014bf80a823457bdbfc3acb5fac4b4a666715a1)' As I can

RE: Estatio Updates

h upstream Isis right now, should be there in > 30 minutes. > > On 20 January 2016 at 18:50, Nacho Cánovas Rejón < > n.cano...@gesconsultor.com> wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> >> >> I watched http://repository-estatio.forge.cloudbees.com/ and there >

Estatio Updates

Hi. I watched http://repository-estatio.forge.cloudbees.com/ and there aren’t been updates since 4 of January. ¿Can you upload apache ISIS versions to employ it on your projects? Right now I’m on 1.12 version and I use this repository. Thanks a lot.

RE: Apache Isis version 1.11.0 JAVA 1.7 Error

t; > I think we should issue a patch (1.11.1) to fix that. And > > > > obviously > I > > > need > > > > to look at the release procedures so that this error doesn't > > > > occur in > > the > > > > future. > > > > > > > > I'll try

ISIS-848 Problem with not Wicket Viewer

Hi Dan. I think this is my last problem with new ISIS version because it's working right now on my application. In this case is a problem with IsisWebAppBootstrapper. I analyze the code, and DomainApplication on SimpleApp is the class that does configuration in wicket viewer, instead of

HiddenFacet wrong behavior

Hi again Dan. I updated all annotations and is one behavior with Hidden not contemplated. Actions, properties and collections declares well a HidenFacet with their own annotation, but the problem is when we try to get HidenFacet from a Contributed Action, it always returns is not hide. I

Re: HiddenFacet wrong behavior

or based on simpleapp?) Thanks Dan [1] https://github.com/isisaddons/isis-app-todoapp On 28 August 2015 at 14:07, Nacho Cánovas Rejón n.cano...@gesconsultor.com wrote: Hi again Dan. I updated all annotations and is one behavior with Hidden not contemplated. Actions, properties and collections

Re: ISIS-1044 issue with Collections

Cánovas Rejón n.cano...@gesconsultor.com wrote: Hi Dan. In order to test new changes on 1.9.0 release, I think I find some bug. My problem is in *ISIS-1044: fixing by filtering the PropertyAccessorFacet and CollectionAccessorFacet, also the ActionInvocationFacet (for contributed collections

Re: isis-module-security - Configuration alternative way?

in the meantime. Thanks Dan [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1173 The reason - the security module as released to maven central repo, as opposed to the demo app that merely demonstrates its 2015-07-15 13:35 GMT+01:00 Nacho Cánovas Rejón n.cano...@gesconsultor.com: Hi Dan

Feedback - ISIS-1171: if missing, default datanucleus.schema.autoCreateAll to false, not true (to avoid accidental modification of a target database).

Hi. Some point out I found. When we update to a version after ISIS-1171 commit, and we executed any junit test, it seems to be an infinite loop, so never ends the executed test. This is the log test writes: / //11:13:31,331 [ServicesInstallerFromConfigurationAndAnnotation main INFO

isis-module-security - Configuration alternative way?

Hi Dan. I was including isis-module-security to our webapp and I followed your Readme file, but I had to deal with some differences on this. I don't know if I lost something or if the configuration I made is well too. org.isisaddons.module.security.seed.SeedSecurityModuleService needs

Re: Session already open and context not configured for autoclose

to inspect the changes, see [1] and [2] Thanks Dan [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1169 [2] https://github.com/apache/isis/commit/edc4fa7648f73dea2c3be41de24b29ca76af9fe4 On 18 May 2015 at 15:14, Nacho Cánovas Rejón n.cano...@gesconsultor.com wrote: Hi Dan. Don't worry about

Re: 1:N Relationships aren't persisted on DB DN4

, there is some configuration for this?. Right now isn't working, but I assume it will be some other exception that doesn't shows. I'll keep you posted. El 22/05/2015 a las 10:28, Dan Haywood escribió: On 21 May 2015 at 18:28, Nacho Cánovas Rejón n.cano...@gesconsultor.com wrote: I have more information

Re: 1:N Relationships aren't persisted on DB DN4

] http://www.datanucleus.org/products/datanucleus/jdo/orm/one_to_many_collection.html#fk_bi [2] https://isis.apache.org/components/objectstores/jdo/managed-1-to-m-relationships.html [3] http://markmail.org/message/agnwmzocvdfht32f On 21 May 2015 at 11:49, Nacho Cánovas Rejón n.cano

1:N Relationships aren't persisted on DB DN4

Hi. Since we updated to DataNucleus 4 we have some issue about 1:N relationships. In DB is not persisted when we add to the collection an element. I show you one code example of 1:N relationship that fails and to explain it better: public abstract class Node extends ActiveStructureElement

Re: 1:N Relationships aren't persisted on DB DN4

a las 14:08, Nacho Cánovas Rejón escribió: Hi have same issue changing the code like you said (host.setHostContainer(this);) and with isis.persistor.datanucleus.impl.datanucleus.persistenceByReachabilityAtCommit=false , so next step is your sample app. El 21/05/2015 a las 13:00, Dan Haywood

Re: Session already open and context not configured for autoclose

by thread. It also might make sense to put together some sort of performance load test to see if we can make the problem easier to replicate? Let me know your thoughts... Cheers Dan On 14 May 2015 at 16:22, Nacho Cánovas Rejón n.cano...@gesconsultor.com wrote: Hi everybody. There is some