: David Tildesley [mailto:davo...@yahoo.co.nz]
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 4:36 PM
To: d...@isis.apache.org; users@isis.apache.org
Subject: Re: ISIS-970 ... (new annotations) please review if you get a
chance...
Sorry - too many new years eve beers - I typed DOI when I meant DI
(fuddled
31, 2014 4:36 PM
To: d...@isis.apache.org; users@isis.apache.org
Subject: Re: ISIS-970 ... (new annotations) please review if you get a
chance...
Sorry - too many new years eve beers - I typed DOI when I meant DI (fuddled
with IoC in my brain).
On Thursday, 1 January 2015 11:04 AM
, 2014 4:36 PM
To: d...@isis.apache.org; users@isis.apache.org
Subject: Re: ISIS-970 ... (new annotations) please review if you get a
chance...
Sorry - too many new years eve beers - I typed DOI when I meant DI
(fuddled with IoC in my brain).
On Thursday, 1 January 2015 11:04 AM, David
This is a good compromise IMHO.
Jeremy D. Branham
Tel: **DOTNET
-Original Message-
From: Dan Haywood [mailto:d...@haywood-associates.co.uk]
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2015 7:27 AM
To: users
Cc: d...@isis.apache.org
Subject: Re: ISIS-970 ... (new annotations) please review if you get
: Saturday, January 03, 2015 7:27 AM
To: users
Cc: d...@isis.apache.org
Subject: Re: ISIS-970 ... (new annotations) please review if you get a
chance...
On 3 January 2015 at 13:14, Jeroen van der Wal jer...@stromboli.it wrote:
I have one more thought: since @ViewModel and
@DomainObject(nature
PM
To: d...@isis.apache.org; users@isis.apache.org
Subject: Re: ISIS-970 ... (new annotations) please review if you get a chance...
Sorry - too many new years eve beers - I typed DOI when I meant DI (fuddled
with IoC in my brain).
On Thursday, 1 January 2015 11:04 AM, David Tildesley davo
Tildesley [mailto:davo...@yahoo.co.nz]
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 4:36 PM
To: d...@isis.apache.org; users@isis.apache.org
Subject: Re: ISIS-970 ... (new annotations) please review if you get a
chance...
Sorry - too many new years eve beers - I typed DOI when I meant DI (fuddled
with Model in Spring-MVC)
Jeremy D. Branham
Tel: **DOTNET
From: Jeroen van der Wal [mailto:jer...@stromboli.it]
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 7:37 AM
To: dev; users
Subject: Re: ISIS-970 ... (new annotations) please review if you get a
chance...
I like this discussion because it's
It seems here that the key question is 'what is a View-Model in DDD terms'?
They are not entities - they do not have Identity and a thread of
continuity although they may expose the properties of entities that do.
The are not value objects - they are not immutable.
I would argue that
Wal [mailto:jer...@stromboli.it]
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 7:37 AM
To: dev; users
Subject: Re: ISIS-970 ... (new annotations) please review if you get a chance...
I like this discussion because it's defining where Apache Isis is right now.
Personally I think Isis has grown far beyond
@isis.apache.org
Subject: Re: ISIS-970 ... (new annotations) please review if you get a chance...
Sorry - too many new years eve beers - I typed DOI when I meant DI (fuddled
with IoC in my brain).
On Thursday, 1 January 2015 11:04 AM, David Tildesley
davo...@yahoo.co.nz wrote:
Hi Jeremy
11 matches
Mail list logo
