Re: Sparql from Database

2012-09-04 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 04/09/12 09:54, Yoga Indra Pamungkas wrote: String queryString = PREFIX ont: http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2012/7/OntologySkripsiKomputasi.owl# + PREFIX dl: http://www.digilib.stis.ac.id/skripsi/ + PREFIX rdf:

SPARQL Update and Jena

2012-09-04 Thread Laurent Pellegrino
Hello all, Is it possible to retrieve the entries which have been deleted/updated during the execution of a SPARQL update query or at least to know the number of entries which have been altered? Kind Regards, Laurent Pellegrino

Re: SPARQL Update and Jena

2012-09-04 Thread Paul Gearon
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Laurent Pellegrino laurent.pellegr...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, Is it possible to retrieve the entries which have been deleted/updated during the execution of a SPARQL update query or at least to know the number of entries which have been altered? Not

TDB Distribution

2012-09-04 Thread Don Pellegrino
The TDB Download and Installation page (http://jena.apache.org/documentation/tdb/tdb_download.html) reads: Currently, TDB is a separate download from the main release of Jena. The TDB download includes a compatible copy of Jena. The TDB Command-line Utilities page

Re: SPARQL Update and Jena

2012-09-04 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 04/09/12 19:39, Paul Gearon wrote: This is very implementation dependent. For instance, it is permissible for an RDF database to store the same triple multiple times. It just needs to make sure there are no duplicates when it gets around to handling SPARQL requests. One case of this is for

Re: FILTER changes a query from sequence to join

2012-09-04 Thread Holger Knublauch
On 9/3/2012 19:33, Andy Seaborne wrote: Holger, You've used ?dummy inside the GRAPH (where it will be undef) which blocks the optimizer from using (sequence) Bottom-up evaluation: logically the inner part of the GRAPH is calculated and then combined with the rest of the top-level pattern