On 22/01/13 23:23, Bardo Nelgen wrote:
Hi all,
for a content inclusion project I recently wrote the following SPARQL
query, had it validated at http://sparql.org/query-validator.html and
tested locally with Twinkle 2 – all doing perfectly well.
PREFIX html:http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml
By the way I would not treat Twinkle as a good SPARQL validator. Last I
knew Twinkle was using a very outdated version of ARQ which significantly
pre-dates the Jena transition into Apache
Use sparql.org as Andy suggests which runs the latest release version, or
if you download and run our Fuseki
Hi Andy,
thanks for the fast reply and thank you very much for the hint.
I'll send a copy of this to our programmers then. Just originally
assumed the error resided inside the SPARQLing (I'm just the markup-guy…
;-) )
Nonetheless, here comes the stacktrace (short version):
Thanks, Rob — that really appears to be the more reliable approach.
Am 23.01.2013 11:24, schrieb Rob Vesse:
By the way I would not treat Twinkle as a good SPARQL validator. Last I
knew Twinkle was using a very outdated version of ARQ which significantly
pre-dates the Jena transition into
Recorded as
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-384
On 21/01/13 06:18, Holger Knublauch wrote:
I recently updated our code base from Jena 2.7.2 to Jena 2.7.4 and had a
few test failures. I narrowed it down to the following scenario:
import junit.framework.Assert;
import
Dear Jena users,
I need an advice on whether to use transactional TDB or
non-transactional one, and if I use non-transactional; when to use TDB.sync.
As far as I understand from the tutorials, if I have never call a
transaction operation on a dataset (i.e. dataset.begin(..)), then my TDB
Hi.
Assume the attached RDF file. This is a simple
Manufacturer - Europe (subclass) - Germany (subclass) - Audi (subclass)
- Instance,
which has been created using inference for subclass and type from jena.
The problem that I have is that if I get the root class (in this example
Hi Panagiotis,
On 23/01/13 18:46, Panagiotis Papadakos wrote:
Assume the attached RDF file. This is a simple
Manufacturer - Europe (subclass) - Germany (subclass) - Audi
(subclass) - Instance,
which has been created using inference for subclass and type from jena.
The problem that I have is
On 23/01/13 14:50, A. Anil SINACI wrote:
Dear Jena users,
I need an advice on whether to use transactional TDB or
non-transactional one, and if I use non-transactional; when to use
TDB.sync.
As far as I understand from the tutorials, if I have never call a
transaction operation on a dataset
