Re: instanceof

2016-10-02 Thread Andy Seaborne
instanceof applies to Java classes. It is a feature of the programming language. To see if an instance is of data-declared class, which is a separate concept, use getOntClass, hasOntClass or listOntClass methods on Individual. On 02/10/16 21:55, tina sani wrote: I have Employee class and

instanceof

2016-10-02 Thread tina sani
I have Employee class and "Managers" and "Technicals" as two sub classes of Employee. Bob is instance of sub class Technical, how can I get like this: If Bob instance of Technicals, then do something: OntClass mgr = model.getOntClass(ns + "Managers"); OntClass tech =

Re: Fetch value from data property

2016-10-02 Thread neha gupta
Thanks a lot sir Lorenz. On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 5:30 AM, Lorenz B. < buehm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> wrote: > Yes, but according to Javadoc only if there is at most one value, > otherwise you get one of the values randomly. For multiple values you > would have to use listPropertyValues > >

Re: Fetch value from data property

2016-10-02 Thread Lorenz B.
Yes, but according to Javadoc only if there is at most one value, otherwise you get one of the values randomly. For multiple values you would have to use listPropertyValues > Is it the right way to get int value from a property? > > RDFNode intValue =team1.getPropertyValue(wins); > > On Sun, Oct

Re: Fetch value from data property

2016-10-02 Thread neha gupta
Is it the right way to get int value from a property? RDFNode intValue =team1.getPropertyValue(wins); On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 4:27 AM, Lorenz B. < buehm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> wrote: > > > > "You have to get the "wins" value for "team1" first" > > This is the basic problem I do not know

Re: Fetch value from data property

2016-10-02 Thread Lorenz B.
> "You have to get the "wins" value for "team1" first" > This is the basic problem I do not know how to get the int value from > "wins"? Not from "wins" but from the resource "team1" which is related by the property "wins" to an integer value. If you do not understand this, you will never be