Hi Andy,
I seem to have a configuration that's working, where my named graphs are
persisting. See new config file below. However, it's horribly slow. I am
running Java code which is reading 60,000 records and running SPARQL queries
and updates viathe REST API. It will eventually will produce
did you get those results when running only this subquery? Afaik, the
default limit of the Lucene text query is at most 10 000 documents - and
I don't think that the outer LIMIT would make it to the Lucene request
On 18.10.22 13:35, Mikael Pesonen wrote:
I have a bigger query that starts
I have a bigger query that starts with inner select
{ SELECT ?s ?score WHERE {
(?s ?score) text:query (skos:prefLabel skos:altLabel "\"xx yy\""
"lang:en" ) .
} order by desc(?score) offset 0 limit 1000 }
There are about 1 results. limit 1000 returns ~560 and limit 100 ~75
On 18/10/2022 10:57, Marco Neumann wrote:
Can you briefly explain / guess how this degradation was introduced? I
presume we are not testing for regression in the unit tests. might be best
addressed in dev.
Élie linked to a GH issue that links onwards to the JIRA ticket.
Andy
Marco
Can you briefly explain / guess how this degradation was introduced? I
presume we are not testing for regression in the unit tests. might be best
addressed in dev.
Marco
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 10:46 AM Holger Knublauch
wrote:
> Yes! This seems to have fixed it:
>
>
Yes! This seems to have fixed it:
ARQ.getContext().set(ARQ.optReorderBGP, false);
Many thanks,
Holger
> On 18 Oct 2022, at 11:29 am, Élie Roux wrote:
>
> Perhaps this is an instance of
> https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/1533 ? What triple reordering
> optimization are you using?
>
>
Perhaps this is an instance of
https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/1533 ? What triple reordering
optimization are you using?
Best,
--
Elie
> On 18 Oct 2022, at 11:01 am, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>
>
> On 18/10/2022 09:07, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>> We also observe some slowness.
>
> Could you expand on that, please? e.g. figures, and references to previous
> releases.
I am still profiling this and haven't been able to fully
On 18/10/2022 09:07, Holger Knublauch wrote:
We also observe some slowness.
Could you expand on that, please? e.g. figures, and references to
previous releases.
Andy
We are about to upgrade from 4.3 to 4.6 and notice that GraphMem was deprecated
in the meantime. We also observe some slowness. In order to eliminate the
possibility that this is due to changes to GraphMem may I get a confirmation
that 4.6 still uses the same old GraphMem as previous versions?
Hi,
comments inline
On 17.10.22 14:35, Mikael Pesonen wrote:
This works as a separate query, but not in a the middle, since ?s gets
new values instead of binding to previous ?s.
{ select ?t where {
?s a ?t .
} limit 10}
?t skos:prefLabel ?l
In the middle of what? Subqueries will be
11 matches
Mail list logo
