d got: java.net.UnknownHostException
example.com
at
org.apache.jena.sparql.engine.http.TestService.testStringTimeout(TestService.java:107)
]]
Ubuntu 18.04
Maven: 3.6.0
Java 8
--
--------
Brian McBride
brian.mcbr
ahead without at least an interim resolution to this issue?
Regards
Brian
Regards,
Chris
On Sep 1, 2019, at 2:25 PM, Chris Tomlinson wrote:
Hi Brian,
On Sep 1, 2019, at 7:17 AM, Brian McBride mailto:brian.mcbr...@epimorphics.com>> wrote:
It used to be the case that JenaText sup
aText with a custom TextDocProducer implementation.
--
--------
Brian McBride
brian.mcbr...@epimorphics.com
Epimorphics Ltd www.epimorphics.com
Court Lodge, 105 High Street, Portishead, Bristol BS20 6PT
Tel: 01275 399069
Epimorphics Ltd. is a limited company registered in England (number 7016688
: OR the
The “:” could be escaped like
?s text:query (“street\\: the” 300)
Which would be an OR.
I don’t think any of this has changed sice 3.3.0
Regards,
Chris
On Aug 31, 2019, at 3:08 PM, Brian McBride
wrote:
2) I ran our integration tests with the 3.13.0-SNAPSHOT installed
OT builds (Java8, nightly)
* release build for vote
* release ; Mark JIRA closed.
with discussion at any point (and after)
Andy
On 29/08/2019 15:06, Brian McBride wrote:
Thanks for the update.
I have done a build* based on the pull request and will try it out
in a test environment, hopef
tring: the
Not following that bit - but as I say - the query has specified the
field name.
Regards
Brian
--
--------
Brian McBride
brian.mcbr...@epimorphics.com
Epimorphics Ltd www.epimorphics.com
Court Lodge, 105 High Street,
uest
* merge
* builds (Java 8 (15mins polling), Java 11, Java 14 (once a day)) ;
* mark JIRA as "Resolved"
* development SNAPSHOT builds (Java8, nightly)
* release build for vote
* release ; Mark JIRA closed.
with discussion at any point (and after)
Andy
On 29/08/2019 15:06, Bria
://github.com/apache/jena/pull/595
Documentation draft (temp location):
https://gist.github.com/afs/1d4c6584723b72c5e7b892057029a8f4
Andy
On 06/08/2019 15:00, Brian McBride wrote:
Hi Andy,
That looks good. I'd be happy to help test it out when you get to
that point.
Brian
On 05/08/2019
.
Andy
On 05/08/2019 13:57, Brian McBride wrote:
I have just had a problem with query timeout overrides when upgrading
to Fuseki 3.12.0. I think the issue is related to JENA-1620 [1]
which was deployed with Jena 3.10.0.
Essentially, JENA-1620 modified the query timeout override
functionality
I have just had a problem with query timeout overrides when upgrading to
Fuseki 3.12.0. I think the issue is related to JENA-1620 [1] which was
deployed with Jena 3.10.0.
Essentially, JENA-1620 modified the query timeout override functionality
to constrain timeout overrides so that they must
/18 09:00, Brian McBride wrote:
Hi Lorenz,
On 30/01/18 07:30, Lorenz Buehmann wrote:
Hi Brian,
I can't help you with this problem,
You have thanks. You have reminded me I should check on the latest
version of Fuseki (I hadn't realised the one I'm running is so old).
I've just tried
.
Also, the performance might have been improved.
Cheers,
Lorenz
On 30.01.2018 08:05, Brian McBride wrote:
My appologies if you have seen this before: I'm having a little
trouble unsubscribing from an obsolete email address.
I'm having a problem with fuseki backups. We do a nightly backup
My appologies if you have seen this before: I'm having a little trouble
unsubscribing from an obsolete email address.
I'm having a problem with fuseki backups. We do a nightly backup of a
Fuseki server and after about 3 weeks, the backups hang. Fuseki
continues serving queries normally. We
Would adding a filter
FILTER (?bf1 <= ?bf2)
or similar do the trick?
Brian
On 15/11/16 00:09, lookman sanni wrote:
Hi,
I have the following RDF:
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#;
xmlns:j.0="http://www.somelink.org/ofdf#;>
ote:
I would prefer the assembler option as that is only fixing the cause of
the specific bug and it in my mind fixes the assembler API semantics to
what I mentally expect
Rob
On 18/01/2016 14:09, "Brian McBride" <br...@epimorphics.com> wrote:
On 22/12/15 18:22, Andy
If I use GET to query a Fuseki 2.3.1 SPARQL endpoint I can specify a
timeout=foo parameter in the request url. The timeout for the query
will be set to foo, overriding a server timeout set in the Fuseki
configuration file. This works even if there is no allowTimeoutOverride
set in the
data
sets - there is one index+tdb-dataset pair in the configuration.
What's fuseki:allowTimeoutOverride? Is this a local build with the
code for that uncommented out?
Andy
On 21/12/15 14:53, Brian McBride wrote:
The fuseki configuration below sets up two services with a shared
dataset
-tabpanel#comment-13712368
Thanks for looking at this.
Brian
Andy
On 21/12/15 14:53, Brian McBride wrote:
The fuseki configuration below sets up two services with a shared
dataset. The dataset has a lucene text index.
This configuration works on Fuseki 1.3.1. Fuseki 2.3.1 fails to start
The fuseki configuration below sets up two services with a shared
dataset. The dataset has a lucene text index.
This configuration works on Fuseki 1.3.1. Fuseki 2.3.1 fails to start.
The log output is shown below. Looks like the lucene index may be
trying to grab a lock for the dataset
)
Andy
On 16/12/15 16:53, Brian McBride wrote:
What is the default value for FUSEKI_BASE when running as a service?
I found a page
https://jena.apache.org/documentation/fuseki2/fuseki-layout.html
that says it should be /etc/fuseki. However, I'm not sure if this page
has been 'officially
What is the default value for FUSEKI_BASE when running as a service?
I found a page
https://jena.apache.org/documentation/fuseki2/fuseki-layout.html
that says it should be /etc/fuseki. However, I'm not sure if this page
has been 'officially published' or is up to date.
When I run Fuseki
Hi Rajiv,
You can find how to set query timeouts in the Fuseki documentation at [1]
To set server wide timeout:
[] rdf:type fuseki:Server ;
#Server-wide context parameters can be given here.
#For example, to set query timeouts: on a server-wide basis:
#Format 1:
I am considering running a production Fuseki server on a system where
Fuseki's files will be on an NFS mounted file system.
Does anyone know whether there might be any issues with whether an NFS
mounted file system meets the requirements on which Fuseki's transaction
support relies?
Brian
For testing, I would like to fire up a fuseki server with an in memory
dataset and a union default graph.
Is this possible?
I can configure a fuseki server with an in memory dataset using --mem
but I see no way to tell it to set a union default graph.
I can configure a fuseki server with an
Thanks Andy - just what I needed.
Brian
On 26/09/2013 14:22, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 26/09/13 08:11, Brian McBride wrote:
For testing, I would like to fire up a fuseki server with an in memory
dataset and a union default graph.
Is this possible?
I can configure a fuseki server
Is there an abstraction I can use that will allow me to execute sparql
updates on both local data stores and remote services over http?
I have a method that performs a sparql update. Following [1]
it looks like this:
void doUpdate(Dataset dataset) {
String updateString = ... ;
On 24/09/2013 17:02, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Is there an abstraction I can use that will allow me to execute sparql
updates on both local data stores and remote services over http?
[...]
)
The javadoc for DatasetFactory.create
/** Create a dataset with a default graph and no named
Jena jdbc looks like it would meet my needs. Thanks for the pointer.
Brian
On 24 Sep 2013, at 21:04, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
On 24/09/13 20:02, Brian McBride wrote:
On 24/09/2013 17:02, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Is there an abstraction I can use that will allow me to execute
Hi Frederic,
On 10/05/2013 09:52, Frederic Toublanc wrote:
Hello everyone,
I really need some info about the size of the jena TDB.
We need to be sure that this triplestore will fit to our needs, can someone
please answer the folowwing question :
The size of our jena TDB is increasing as hell
On 10/05/2013 15:29, Bill Roberts wrote:
I'm pretty confident that an empty TDB database does not occupy 192MB.
It does on a Mac - as explained in Andy's mail a little while ago.
Gosh! I just reread Andy's message. Frederic says he is using Windows 7.
Brian
Not sure what OS Frederic
I spotted an inconsistency in the ontology.
#NewsOrganization has a restriction:
[[
rdfs:subClassOf
owl:Restriction
owl:onProperty rdf:resource=#associatedWith /
owl:maxCardinality
rdf:datatype=xsd;nonNegativeInteger0
On 18/03/2013 20:18, Joshua TAYLOR wrote:
Wouldn't the maxCardinality 0 mean that every NewsOrganization isn't
associatedWith *anything*, so there should never be a [newsOrgX
associatedWith foo] to use with [associatedWith domain Person] to
infer [newsOrgX a Person]?
That's true and I've been
On 18/03/2013 21:36, Dave Reynolds wrote:
On 18/03/13 21:16, Joshua TAYLOR wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Brian McBride
br...@epimorphics.com wrote:
On 18/03/2013 20:18, Joshua TAYLOR wrote:
Wouldn't the maxCardinality 0 mean that every NewsOrganization isn't
associatedWith
33 matches
Mail list logo
