Hello:
Is it possible to infer new knowledge about an ontology only from a query in
SPARQL?
I have a question about the use of the SPARQL language about ontologies. So far
I have thought that SPARQL is the equivalent to the SQL language in the
relational databases, that is to say, that
Hello :
Is it an error to define two properties of objects as inverse to each other
and at the same time disjunct?
The reasoner HermiT 1.3.8.3 is generating the following error and I am
suspecting that is why:
However, other reasoners and evaluative tools such as OOPS, Pellet and TrOWL do
support for that. Anything else?
Best Regards, Manuel Puebla.
- Mensaje original -
De: "Abduladem Eljamel" <a_elja...@yahoo.co.uk>
Para: "Manuel Enrique Puebla Martinez" <mpue...@uci.cu>
Enviados: Viernes, 26 de Mayo 2017 5:48:12
Asunto: Re: [M
protege-u...@lists.stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: [protege-user] "DisjointDataProperties" only for the data
properties of a class.
Message-ID: <36b01b11-05b2-476b-a339-bf5ca700d...@stanford.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> On May 17, 2017, at 7:27
: "Dave Reynolds" <dave.e.reyno...@gmail.com>
> Para: users@jena.apache.org
> Enviados: Domingo, 19 de Marzo 2017 13:45:48
> Asunto: Re: [MASSMAIL]Re: about TDB JENA
>
> On 19/03/17 15:52, Manuel Enrique Puebla Martinez wrote:
>> I consider that I did not kn
I consider that I did not know how to explain correctly in my previous email, I
repeat the two questions:
1) I read the page https://jena.apache.org/documentation/tdb/assembler.html, I
do not think it is what I need.
I work with large OWL2 ontologies from the OWLAPI framework, generated
