Re: Aw: Re: SHACL validation doesn't show an error

2020-11-02 Thread Thomas Francart
Hello Le lun. 2 nov. 2020 à 08:52, Lorenz Buehmann < buehm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> a écrit : > I suggested to use SHACL but I thought it's clear that you need to > create the corresponding SHACL shapes then - I should be more specific > in the future. > > Regarding your question, no this

Re: Aw: Re: SHACL validation doesn't show an error

2020-11-01 Thread Lorenz Buehmann
I suggested to use SHACL but I thought it's clear that you need to create the corresponding SHACL shapes then - I should be more specific in the future. Regarding your question, no this still won't work. Maybe you didn't understand the issue at all, but in OWL you have two things to keep in mind:

Aw: Re: SHACL validation doesn't show an error

2020-11-01 Thread alexander . fandre
Thanks for your answer :) Is there a way to validate the two files ( data.rdf and schema.rdf ) as .rdf? So without changing the schema... ? I tried with the jena reasoner and with adding ALLDifferent to deny the open world assumption, but that doesnt help ? Alex       Gesendet: Sonntag,