From: Holger Knublauch hol...@knublauch.com
To: users@jena.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 3:20 AM
Subject: Re: Change in execution order between Jena 2.7.2 and 2.7.3
On 8/13/2012 5:20, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 12/08/12 02:46, Holger Knublauch wrote:
...
but we and our
Knublauch hol...@knublauch.com
To: users@jena.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 3:20 AM
Subject: Re: Change in execution order between Jena 2.7.2 and 2.7.3
On 8/13/2012 5:20, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 12/08/12 02:46, Holger Knublauch wrote:
...
but we and our customers have an unknown
...@knublauch.com
To: users@jena.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 3:20 AM
Subject: Re: Change in execution order between Jena 2.7.2 and 2.7.3
On 8/13/2012 5:20, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 12/08/12 02:46, Holger Knublauch wrote:
...
but we and our customers have an unknown number of queries
On 8/13/2012 5:20, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 12/08/12 02:46, Holger Knublauch wrote:
...
but we and our customers have an unknown number of queries in
production
...
TQ gets Jena for free.
Yes and this is greatly appreciated. You guys are doing an amazing job.
We have built quite an empire
On 12/08/12 02:46, Holger Knublauch wrote:
...
but we and our customers have an unknown number of queries in
production
...
TQ gets Jena for free. What would help is if TQ tested against the
nightly snapshot builds especially just before a release. The project
makes available development
On 11/08/12 00:50, Holger Knublauch wrote:
On 8/10/2012 19:40, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 10/08/12 02:12, Holger Knublauch wrote:
Andy,
we are evaluating the move to 2.7.3 and have been immediately hit by
what looks like a change of SPARQL semantics in ARQ. See the attached
Java test which
Hi Andy,
oh my, this is really a bigger issue than I thought. The following query
pattern also no longer works
SELECT *
WHERE {
GRAPH http://spinrdf.org/spin {
?x rdfs:label ?label .
}
BIND (?label AS ?result) .
}
The above is again an artificial test case that makes no
On 8/10/2012 19:40, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 10/08/12 02:12, Holger Knublauch wrote:
Andy,
we are evaluating the move to 2.7.3 and have been immediately hit by
what looks like a change of SPARQL semantics in ARQ. See the attached
Java test which returns Test in 272 but null in 273. The query is
