Re: Fuseki growing in size and need for compaction

2024-04-24 Thread Martynas Jusevičius
Andy, Not directly related, but would different storage backend address issues like this? It might sound a bit like the legacy SDB, but AFAIK oxigraph, Stardog and another commercial triplestore use RocksDB for storage. https://github.com/oxigraph/oxigraph

Re: Fuseki growing in size and need for compaction

2024-04-24 Thread Andy Seaborne
Hi Balduin, Thanks for the detailed report. It's useful to hear of the use case that occur and also the behaviour of specific deployments. On 22/04/2024 16:22, Balduin Landolt wrote: Hello, we're running Fuseki 5.0.0 (but previously the last 4.x versions behaved essentially the same) with

Re: Fuseki growing in size and need for compaction

2024-04-23 Thread Mikael Pesonen
We have the same issue and have stopped using Jena for that reason. On 22/04/2024 18:22, Balduin Landolt wrote: Hello, we're running Fuseki 5.0.0 (but previously the last 4.x versions behaved essentially the same) with roughly 40 Mio triples (tendency: growing). Not sure what configuration is

Fuseki growing in size and need for compaction

2024-04-22 Thread Balduin Landolt
Hello, we're running Fuseki 5.0.0 (but previously the last 4.x versions behaved essentially the same) with roughly 40 Mio triples (tendency: growing). Not sure what configuration is relevant, but we have the default graph as the union graph. Also, we use Fuseki as our main database, not just as a