Nothing that you wouldn't look at for any other server application. The size of
the dataset may not make as big a difference as the character of your queries
(how much scanning are they doing, are you using expansive property paths, that
sort of thing).
---
A. Soroka
The University of Virginia
> It caches as much as it can so should not thrash the disk unless you
> have a very heavy update load (in which case, you really want the disk
> copy to be updated safely).
In the case of a read-only dataset (few 10s of GBs), is there anything in
particular that I should keep an eye on, or is it
On 06/04/17 01:29, Laura Morales wrote:
Does anybody know how demanding is Jena/Fuseki on the hard disk? I mean in
terms of I/O operations, is it going to kill my hard disk or is it optimized
somehow?
It caches as much as it can so should not thrash the disk unless you
have a very heavy up
Does anybody know how demanding is Jena/Fuseki on the hard disk? I mean in
terms of I/O operations, is it going to kill my hard disk or is it optimized
somehow?
Is there any benchmark for Fuseki vs disk I/O?
