RDF-syntax-check GH action

Hi, I made a riot-based RDF syntax checking GH action: https://github.com/AtomGraph/RDF-syntax-check Maybe it can be of use :) Martynas

Re: sparql query performance jena v2, 3, 4

On 28/02/2023 03:11, Paul Tyson wrote: I maintain an old jena/fuseki application that has happily been using jena v2.13 and tdb v1.1.2 for several years. It loads 1b+ triples into a tdb database, and runs a couple dozen queries, some not so trivial, on the tdb. Now it is time to update

Re: [SHACL] sh:prefixes

I know, almost everybody stumbles there. It was bad editing by the editor :) Unfortunately I cannot just go into that document and fix it. That's the bane of these formal specs, and why many people get work done quicker outside of such formal processes. Holger > On 28 Feb 2023, at 1:24 pm,

Re: [SHACL] sh:prefixes

Thanks Holger, that is the case :) The "sh:prefixes ex:" in the SHACL spec was somewhat confusing without context, because it looks like a Turtle prefix declaration. This works: :prefixes sh:declare [ sh:prefix "skos" ; sh:namespace "http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#"^^xsd:anyURI ; ]

Re: [SHACL] sh:prefixes

I suspect this is another instance of the common misunderstanding: the @prefix declarations are not mapped to any triples and are only a concept of the serialization. To make them visible to SHACL, you need to declare triples such as in https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/#sparql-prefixes in your

Re: [SHACL] sh:prefixes

Is there something in the WG test suite for this? Andy On 28/02/2023 12:56, Martynas Jusevičius wrote: Hi, Does Jena's SHACL engine support sh:prefixes? Or am I using them wrong? The following test shape @prefix skos: . @prefix sh:

[SHACL] sh:prefixes

Hi, Does Jena's SHACL engine support sh:prefixes? Or am I using them wrong? The following test shape @prefix skos: . @prefix sh: . <#ConceptBroaderCycleShape> a sh:NodeShape ; sh:targetClass skos:Concept ;