Hi all,
I am aware of Graph.isIsomorphicWith, but I need a function that tests
whether Graph A is a sub-set of Graph B, including the ability to map
bnodes into each other. Does that exist in Jena?
Thanks
Holger
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Holger Knublauch hol...@knublauch.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am aware of Graph.isIsomorphicWith, but I need a function that tests
whether Graph A is a sub-set of Graph B, including the ability to map bnodes
into each other. Does that exist in Jena?
How about:
ask
Hi,
I was recently told that the callback parameter for a Fuseki service
request doesn't properly wrap the brackets e.g.,
On 02/07/12 11:07, Holger Knublauch wrote:
On 7/2/2012 18:47, Stephen Allen wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Holger Knublauch
hol...@knublauch.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am aware of Graph.isIsomorphicWith, but I need a function that tests
whether Graph A is a sub-set of Graph B, including
We are pleased to announce Apache Jena 2.7.2 and Jena Fuseki 0.2.3.
This is primarily a maintenance release to address the issue of
excessive logging in Fuseki when used with transactional TDB.
It does also include improvements in ARQ contributed to the project.
The website for Apache Jena
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Dave Reynolds dave.e.reyno...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/07/12 11:07, Holger Knublauch wrote:
On 7/2/2012 18:47, Stephen Allen wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Holger Knublauch
hol...@knublauch.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am aware of Graph.isIsomorphicWith,
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Joshua TAYLOR joshuaaa...@gmail.com wrote:
Is this the expected behavior? BINDINGS doesn't seem to be rejected,
but silently ignored. I know that initial bindings can be set
programmatically through the API, so I figured that BINDINGS would
work too, but it
On 02/07/12 20:22, Joshua TAYLOR wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Rob Vesse rve...@yarcdata.com wrote:
Hi Joshua
BINDINGS is being changed to be VALUES instead by the SPARQL working group
which works similarly except that it can be applied more broadly i.e. Used
throughout queries rather
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Joshua TAYLOR joshuaaa...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply. I just grabbed the latest versions (and
posted my results with them before I saw this message). Is the syntax
of VALUES documented somewhere? The Working Draft I cited still uses
BINDINGS,
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Joshua TAYLOR joshuaaa...@gmail.com wrote:
I found some examples of queries using VALUES in some diffs shown in
the jena commits mailing list [1]. It seems like the updated query
should be
PREFIX dc: http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/
PREFIX :
BINDINGS has been replaced with VALUES in the latest version of Jena.
You should be able to simply change BINDINGS to VALUES, and your
query would then work. See the SPARQL 1.1 Editor's Draft [1].
-Stephen
[1] http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml#inline-data
On Mon, Jul 2,
11 matches
Mail list logo