Re: Fuzzy Protege and Jena

2017-04-22 Thread tina sani
*unless you try to extract the values and do something with it in your client code* All of the data in our ontology should be either as data property or object property. So cant we just use .getPropertyValue() to extract the data? For example, a person belongs to 0.8% to ClassA and 0.2% to

Re: Fuzzy Protege and Jena

2017-04-22 Thread Lorenz B.
Yes. But you will not be able to use the features of fuzzy OWL unless you try to extract the values and do something with it in your client code. > Hi Lorenz, thank you. > > So it means we could use it with same Jena methods and SPARQL queries > without any changes and need of any plugin? > > >

Re: Fuzzy Protege and Jena

2017-04-22 Thread tina sani
Hi Lorenz, thank you. So it means we could use it with same Jena methods and SPARQL queries without any changes and need of any plugin? On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Lorenz B. < buehm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> wrote: > The ontologies created by the fuzzy OWL plugin in Protege are still

Re: Jena native store indexes

2017-04-22 Thread dandh988
Idiocy IMHO is rather strong. If Jena provided specialist text indexing natively why doesn't it provide other indexing? I process IFC files extensively and use stored inference and secondary indexing to handle the quirks of the IFC format. I would not expect Jena or SPARQL to provide native

Re: Fuzzy Protege and Jena

2017-04-22 Thread Lorenz B.
The ontologies created by the fuzzy OWL plugin in Protege are still OWL ontologies - they just add the fuzzy values to OWL annotation properties. > I am not sure if Jena classes/API supports Fuzzy ontologies in Protege? > Like we read an ontology in our application and query it using Jena syntax,

Fuzzy Protege and Jena

2017-04-22 Thread tina sani
I am not sure if Jena classes/API supports Fuzzy ontologies in Protege? Like we read an ontology in our application and query it using Jena syntax, is it possible for Fuzzy ontologies created in Protege? Any idea?

Re: Jena native store indexes

2017-04-22 Thread baran . ha
On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:01:34 +0200, Rob Vesse wrote: . In the RDF world it may still be useful to create secondary indexes as others have noted for certain kinds of specialised search that cannot be officially expressed in SPARQL. Here is primarily text indexing