Re: bottom-up semantics

2019-02-01 Thread Élie Roux
Hello, Thanks for your answer > (conditional > (bgp > (triple ?loc :locatedInWork ex:Work1) > (triple ?loc :startVolume ?startvol) > ) > (bgp (triple ?loc :endVolume ?endvol))) Am I right in understanding that in that case ?loc

Re: bottom-up semantics

2019-02-01 Thread David Jordan
I have an unusual request for this group, but I am trying to remember the name of a particular application development platform that I believe was based on the semantic web. I believe this is a commercial product, books were published on it, but I simply cannot remember the name. They presented at

RE: Fuskei2 configuration, TDB2 data, Inferencing with ontologies, Persisting named graphs upon server restart

2019-02-01 Thread Pierre Grenon
Hi Andy, picking up the prefatory questions first, in line below. > Hi Pierre, > > A few points to start with: > > 1/ For my general understanding of how we might take the inferene > provision further in jena, what inferences are you particularly > interested in? I noticed you like to ask :)

Re: bottom-up semantics

2019-02-01 Thread Martynas Jusevičius
I'd suggest to start by checking the algebra of your query: http://sparql.org On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 1:53 PM Élie Roux wrote: > > Dear Jean users, > > In short, I'm wondering if there could be an option somewhere for a > top-down SPARQL evaluation mechanism. > > Long version: the dataset I'm

bottom-up semantics

2019-02-01 Thread Élie Roux
Dear Jean users, In short, I'm wondering if there could be an option somewhere for a top-down SPARQL evaluation mechanism. Long version: the dataset I'm dealing with contains data in the following form: ex:Loc1 a :Location ; :locatedInWork ex:Work1 ; :startPage 123 ;