Re: Spatial Jena

na-spatial index configuration, > Jena/Fuseki versions you used, and of course the query and results. > > -Osma > > > 09.01.2017, 10:16, Samur Araujo kirjoitti: > >> I test them all and all have the same issue. >> >> I think there are some merging happening

Re: Spatial Jena

el's fork which uses Lucene 5.3.3 > > and see if this makes a difference? > > -Osma > > > 09.01.2017, 10:08, Samur Araujo kirjoitti: > >> Hi Osma, as you can see below, it makes no difference: >> >> >> [2017-01-09 09:07:12] Fuseki INFO [4] POST /spatial ::

Re: Spatial Jena

so fast and the result set contains only 17 resources. On 9 January 2017 at 08:55, Osma Suominen <osma.suomi...@helsinki.fi> wrote: > Hi Samur! > > Does it help if you drop the DISTINCT? > > -Osma > > > 09.01.2017, 09:49, Samur Araujo kirjoitti: > >> Hi all, I

Spatial Jena

Hi all, I noticed that jena spatial is very slow. Query like the one below take 3s to execute (under entire geonames). PREFIX spatial: PREFIX rdfs: SELECT distinct ?place{ ?place spatial:intersectBox (32.55668

Re: Compile Forked Version

fuseki2 too, but it failed with an error that I > suspect is not related to the Lucene changes. > > Hope this helps, > Osma > > > 06.01.2017, 14:27, Samur Araujo wrote: > >> Thank you for all the help! >> >> It is clear now that the fork have several bugs and issues

Re: Compile Forked Version

Thank you for all the help! It is clear now that the fork have several bugs and issues. Best. On 6 January 2017 at 11:51, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On 05/01/17 16:16, Samur Araujo wrote: > >> Thank you Andy, your suggestion worked but I got this

Re: Compile Forked Version

[ 26.072 s] On 5 January 2017 at 16:56, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On 05/01/17 15:26, Samur Araujo wrote: > >> <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.jena.riot.tokens.TS_Tokens >> tokenUnit_iri18(org.apache.jena.riot.tokens.TestTokenizer) T

Re: Compile Forked Version

> The University of Virginia Library > > > On Jan 5, 2017, at 10:13 AM, Samur Araujo <s.ara...@geophy.com> wrote: > > > > I want to run fuseki with lucene 5 or higher. > > > > There is a fork for it here : > > > > https://github.com/jmvanel/jena

Re: Compile Forked Version

o some other > application? There may be an easier way to do all this. > > --- > A. Soroka > The University of Virginia Library > > > On Jan 5, 2017, at 10:01 AM, Samur Araujo <s.ara...@geophy.com> wrote: > > > > I run the sequence of commands below but it

Re: Compile Forked Version

s others have already noted in this thread you will need to do a mvn >> install rather than a package. >> > > Yes - it is looking for "jena-core/3.1.1-myfork-SNAPSHOT" as specificed > in the jena-arq POM. > > >> Rob >> >> On 05/01/2017 07:45, &

Re: Compile Forked Version

name a different artifact. > > Andy > > On 04/01/17 15:41, Lorenz Buehmann wrote: > > You can specify the modules that you want to install or ignore > > > > > > mvn clean install -pl !jena-core > > > > > >

Re: Compile Forked Version

; "mvn clean install" > > > On 04/01/17 13:17, Samur Araujo wrote: > >> Hi all, how do I compile a forked version of Jena? >> >> What are the parameters I need to be passed to maven? >> >> I used "mvn package -o" >> >> But I go

Compile Forked Version

Hi all, how do I compile a forked version of Jena? What are the parameters I need to be passed to maven? I used "mvn package -o" But I got the error: Could not resolve dependencies. -- Senior Data Scientist Geophy www.geophy.com Nieuwe Plantage 54-55 2611XK Delft +31 (0)70 7640725 1 Fore

Re: Jena with Lucene 5 or 6

JENA-1250. > > Is there a specific reason why you need newer Lucene? > > -Osma > > > 3.12.2016, 17:35, Samur Araujo kirjoitti: > >> Is there any plan to migrate Jena/Fuseki for Lucene 5 or 6? >> >> Any fork available that have done the migration already? &

Re: Very slow Geosparql with Jena

<a...@apache.org> wrote: > Quite possibly. jena-spatial is a lightweight solution using an external > index to using geo data - it is not GeoSPARQL. > > (Just running a query once will incur a lot of start-up costs.) > > Andy > > > On 22/12/16 14:39, Samur A

Jena with Lucene 5 or 6

Is there any plan to migrate Jena/Fuseki for Lucene 5 or 6? Any fork available that have done the migration already? Best, -- Senior Data Scientist Geophy www.geophy.com Nieuwe Plantage 54-55 2611XK Delft +31 (0)70 7640725 1 Fore Street EC2Y 9DT London +44 (0)20 37690760

Very slow Geosparql with Jena

Hi all, I loaded geonames(40 million triples) into Fuseki and I indexed the data into lucene. The query below takes 4 seconds to execute. While a similar SQL one into postgis takes 13 ms. PREFIX spatial: PREFIX rdfs:

Re: Text search (lucene) with tdbquery

wrote: > > > On 22/12/16 09:18, Samur Araujo wrote: > >> Hi all, Is it possible to use tdbquery for textsearch? >> >> I have configured, loaded and index the data using tdbloader and >> jena.textindexer. >> >> However, when I use tdbquery to query the da

Text search (lucene) with tdbquery

Hi all, Is it possible to use tdbquery for textsearch? I have configured, loaded and index the data using tdbloader and jena.textindexer. However, when I use tdbquery to query the database it seems to ignore the lucene index. I use the command: tdbquery --desc textsearch.ttl --query search.rq