AW: CONSTRUCT ... ORDER BY

2018-03-29 Thread Neubert, Joachim
.com] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. März 2018 09:41 > An: users@jena.apache.org > Betreff: Re: CONSTRUCT ... ORDER BY > > Yes, SELECT. > > Or you can use rdf:List to store an ordered list. > On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 at 09.02, Laura Morales wrote: > > > OK, makes sense. >

Re: CONSTRUCT ... ORDER BY

2018-03-29 Thread Martynas Jusevičius
, 2018 at 8:47 AM > From: "Lorenz Buehmann" > To: users@jena.apache.org > Subject: Re: CONSTRUCT ... ORDER BY > Nothing - by specification, CONSTRUCT returns an RDF graph which in fact > is a *set* of triples. Set -> unordered > > > On 29.03.2018 07:47, Laura Mo

Re: CONSTRUCT ... ORDER BY

2018-03-29 Thread Laura Morales
OK, makes sense. Is there no way however to return a sorted list of triples? Only SELECT can return sorted results?     Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2018 at 8:47 AM From: "Lorenz Buehmann" To: users@jena.apache.org Subject: Re: CONSTRUCT ... ORDER BY Nothing - by specification, CONSTRU

Re: CONSTRUCT ... ORDER BY

2018-03-28 Thread Lorenz Buehmann
Nothing - by specification, CONSTRUCT returns an RDF graph which in fact is a *set* of triples. Set -> unordered On 29.03.2018 07:47, Laura Morales wrote: > I'm running this query > > > CONSTRUCT { ?sbj ex:property ?obj } > FROM <...> > WHERE { > ?sbj a [] ; >ex:prop

CONSTRUCT ... ORDER BY

2018-03-28 Thread Laura Morales
I'm running this query CONSTRUCT { ?sbj ex:property ?obj } FROM <...> WHERE { ?sbj a [] ; ex:property ?obj . } ORDER BY ?obj but the results are not returned sorted. Actually, it looks like the results are sorted by ?sbj instead. What am I doing wrong?