On 20/04/14 17:13, Saud Aljaloud wrote:
Thanks Paul and Andy,
Why are you suggesting non-public?
The idea is that because we are benchmarking a number of triple
stores, and our choice is to ask each of them about the best
configurations privately for their own store, we want to reduce the
Just use current releases.
We are using current releases, we are not looking for tuning systems but rather
the right configs as this is some sort of an extension. Otherwise, some might
argue that we were unfair/miss features for some stores over others. For
example, buffer size or the way of
On 21/04/14 12:23, Saud Al-Jaloud wrote:
Just use current releases.
We are using current releases, we are not looking for tuning systems
but rather the right configs as this is some sort of an extension.
Otherwise, some might argue that we were unfair/miss features for
some stores over others.
On 21 Apr 2014, at 14:01, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
I'd be interested in hearing in what ways the problem is different from SQL.
Also - in SQL, there is LIKE. Would it be a good idea for SPARQL to have a
separate LIKE
SPARQL 1.1 is good in addressing this. There are now three
On 19/04/14 18:33, Saud Aljaloud wrote:
Dear Jena folks,
We are investigating how efficient different triple stores, including
Jena TDB, handle literal strings within SPARQL. To this end, We are
now working on benchmarking these triple stores against a set of
specific queries, using the Berlin
Thanks Paul and Andy,
Why are you suggesting non-public?
The idea is that because we are benchmarking a number of triple stores, and our
choice is to ask each of them about the best configurations privately for their
own store, we want to reduce the amount of core information of our work being
Dear Jena folks,
We are investigating how efficient different triple stores, including Jena TDB,
handle literal strings within SPARQL.
To this end, We are now working on benchmarking these triple stores against a
set of specific queries, using the Berlin Benchmark (BSBM) test driver [1],
On Sat, 2014-04-19 at 18:33 +0100, Saud Aljaloud wrote:
Dear Jena folks,
We are investigating how efficient different triple stores, including
Jena TDB, handle literal strings within SPARQL. To this end, We are
now working on benchmarking these triple stores against a set of
specific
