On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Martynas Jusevičius marty...@graphity.org
wrote:
Both br/ and br/br are well-formed and equivalent in the XML
context, so why the difference in serialization?
I'm using Jena 2.6.4 and ARQ 2.8.7.
Martynas
graphity.org
Back in the bad old days br/ was not
On 25/06/12 12:57, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
Hey list,
I'd like to know why the following triple
@prefix rdf: http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# .
@prefix awol: http://bblfish.net/work/atom-owl/2006-06-06/AtomOwl.html# .
_:smth awol:xml 'div
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/06/12 13:34, Andy Seaborne wrote:
The best RDF-WG is going to do is make XMLLiteral less mandatory.
'Less mandatory'? :-)
I was writing a similar reply as this came in. It's horrible trying to
explain it, and it will be nice not to have to
Thanks, I didn't realize XMLLiterals have to be canonical.
You don't mean XMLLiterals are going away, do you?
Escaped XML would cut off all XML processing tools (I heavily use XSLT
on RDF/XML, for example).
Martynas
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Damian Steer d.st...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
On 25/06/12 13:43, Damian Steer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/06/12 13:34, Andy Seaborne wrote:
The best RDF-WG is going to do is make XMLLiteral less mandatory.
'Less mandatory'? :-)
I was writing a similar reply as this came in. It's horrible trying to
On 25/06/12 14:05, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
Thanks, I didn't realize XMLLiterals have to be canonical.
You don't mean XMLLiterals are going away, do you?
Escaped XML would cut off all XML processing tools (I heavily use XSLT
on RDF/XML, for example).
Not going way.
They have a special