Re: Strange behaviour of XMLLiterals in RDF/XML

2012-06-26 Thread Claude Warren
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Martynas Jusevičius marty...@graphity.org wrote: Both br/ and br/br are well-formed and equivalent in the XML context, so why the difference in serialization? I'm using Jena 2.6.4 and ARQ 2.8.7. Martynas graphity.org Back in the bad old days br/ was not

Re: Strange behaviour of XMLLiterals in RDF/XML

2012-06-25 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 25/06/12 12:57, Martynas Jusevičius wrote: Hey list, I'd like to know why the following triple @prefix rdf: http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# . @prefix awol: http://bblfish.net/work/atom-owl/2006-06-06/AtomOwl.html# . _:smth awol:xml 'div

Re: Strange behaviour of XMLLiterals in RDF/XML

2012-06-25 Thread Damian Steer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25/06/12 13:34, Andy Seaborne wrote: The best RDF-WG is going to do is make XMLLiteral less mandatory. 'Less mandatory'? :-) I was writing a similar reply as this came in. It's horrible trying to explain it, and it will be nice not to have to

Re: Strange behaviour of XMLLiterals in RDF/XML

2012-06-25 Thread Martynas Jusevičius
Thanks, I didn't realize XMLLiterals have to be canonical. You don't mean XMLLiterals are going away, do you? Escaped XML would cut off all XML processing tools (I heavily use XSLT on RDF/XML, for example). Martynas On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Damian Steer d.st...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:

Re: Strange behaviour of XMLLiterals in RDF/XML

2012-06-25 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 25/06/12 13:43, Damian Steer wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25/06/12 13:34, Andy Seaborne wrote: The best RDF-WG is going to do is make XMLLiteral less mandatory. 'Less mandatory'? :-) I was writing a similar reply as this came in. It's horrible trying to

Re: Strange behaviour of XMLLiterals in RDF/XML

2012-06-25 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 25/06/12 14:05, Martynas Jusevičius wrote: Thanks, I didn't realize XMLLiterals have to be canonical. You don't mean XMLLiterals are going away, do you? Escaped XML would cut off all XML processing tools (I heavily use XSLT on RDF/XML, for example). Not going way. They have a special