Re: optimizing serialization of results from fuseki

On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 08:48 +, Håvard Mikkelsen Ottestad wrote: > Hi, > > Reordering the filters might help. I've tried a bit of this, without much noticeable effect. I understand that these are pretty well optimized when the sparql text is converted to algebra. > > Also, maybe a stats file

Re: optimizing serialization of results from fuseki

Thoughts inline: On 07/01/2016 15:56, "Paul Tyson" wrote: >Here is an actual query, partially obfuscated. It returns about 18K >nodes in 40 seconds, from a dataset of about 17M triples. (The nodes are >not necessarily distinct.) > >The predominant graph structure is like:

Re: optimizing serialization of results from fuseki

Here is an actual query, partially obfuscated. It returns about 18K nodes in 40 seconds, from a dataset of about 17M triples. (The nodes are not necessarily distinct.) The predominant graph structure is like: ?node <- ?lsu -> ?detail -> LSUPROPERTYVALUE Thanks for your attention and any

optimizing serialization of results from fuseki

I have a modest (17M triple) dataset, fairly flat graph. I run some queries selecting nodes with anywhere from 12-20 different property values. Result set counts are anywhere from 10,000 to 30,000 nodes. Total execution time measured at client are in the 30-40 second range. The web request

Re: optimizing serialization of results from fuseki

Hi, Can you post a link to your dataset and queries? If the data isn’t sensitive that is. Regards, Håvard M. Ottestad On 06/01/16 17:17, "Paul Tyson" wrote: >I have a modest (17M triple) dataset, fairly flat graph. I run some >queries selecting nodes with anywhere

Re: optimizing serialization of results from fuseki

On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 18:52 +, Andy Seaborne wrote: > Hi Paul, > > > My question is: is total query time limited by search execution speed, > > or by marshaling and serialization of search results? > > Costs are a bit of both but normally mainly query. It also depends on > the client

Re: optimizing serialization of results from fuseki

Hi Paul, > My question is: is total query time limited by search execution speed, > or by marshaling and serialization of search results? Costs are a bit of both but normally mainly query. It also depends on the client processing. Some context please: 1/ What's the storage layer? 2/ What