Is this something also that should be in 0.8.2.2
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2421 wasn't sure what the lz4
usage has been seems to break on some jdks.
+1 on the snappy fixes
~ Joe Stein
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> +1 for both KAFKA-2189 and 2308.
>
>
Please check this:
https://lonesysadmin.net/2013/12/22/better-linux-disk-caching-performance-vm-dirty_ratio/
I depends on your OS, please research those parameters appropriately and
see what they are on your current system. Based on those parameters the
background syncing will be done by the OS. B
Ah likely not. Will check. Do you have a link to the commit?
> On Aug 15, 2015, at 13:34, Clark Haskins wrote:
>
> I know we ran into the same issue with Camus at LinkedIn and it has since
> been fixed. I hope that we committed the patch to open source.
>
> Are you running the latest versi
I know we ran into the same issue with Camus at LinkedIn and it has since been
fixed. I hope that we committed the patch to open source.
Are you running the latest version of Camus?
-Clark
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 15, 2015, at 10:25 AM, Andrew Otto wrote:
>
> Hm, interesting. So my real
Hm, interesting. So my real issue is more with Camus than with cluster
problems? It seems that Camus won’t consume if it encounters a
ReplicaNotAvailableException.
> On Aug 15, 2015, at 12:02, Clark Haskins wrote:
>
> Replica not available is not a fatal exception. This simply means that th
Hi All,
I was told that only single thread handle client producer request in Kafka
broker which may potentially be a performance problem with request queue-up
if we have many small requests. I am wondering which part of the code I
should read to understand the above logic
Thanks,
-Tao
Replica not available is not a fatal exception. This simply means that there is
a replica that is down.
If you get Leader not available that means the partition is offline.
-Clark
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 15, 2015, at 8:41 AM, Andrew Otto wrote:
>
> Also strange: If I start this broker
Also strange: If I start this broker back up, and then issue a kafkacat
metadata request, I do not see any 'Broker: Replica not available’, even though
this broker’s preferred partitions have not yet replicated back in sync, and
are not the leader. Everything seems normal.
Somehow this broker
I am having trouble with a single broker causing consumers to lag. As I am
troubleshooting this issue, I have stopped this broker in the hopes that other
replicas will take over as leader for this broker’s preferred partitions.
However, when I do so, Camus reports:
kafka.CamusJob: Skipping