The only reason for this request is because I may want to use alternatives
like Consul.
** julio
On 8/9/15, 3:40 PM, "Joe Lawson" wrote:
>Inline responses below.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>Joe Lawson
>
>On Aug 9, 2015 1:52 PM, "Julio Castillo"
>wrote:
>
Bgf1Itdzh9j2bLPt9FEjoay6gO0A&s=
>Rc_80-_j6gjBCp2GKL8sueIP8IKNdt7p7kgBhsPw2ZA&e= ) to Apache which
>implements some generic zk recipes.
>On Aug 9, 2015 11:39 AM, "Julio Castillo"
>wrote:
>
>> Had there been any thought at abstracting the interface to ZooKeeper?
>>
>> The rea
Had there been any thought at abstracting the interface to ZooKeeper?
The reason I'm asking is because I'm looking at Consul for service discovery
today, perhaps a different one tomorrow, but the point here is the ability to
plug in any type of service discovery, K/V store service.
Any thoughts
I read the description of the new Confluent Platform and it briefly
describes some REST access to a producer and a consumer.
Does this mean there is a new process(es) running (Jetty based)?
This process integrates both the consumer and producer libraries?
Thanks
Julio Castillo
NOTICE: This e
Looking around the nom repo, it looks like there is no current support for
0.8.2.
Is the only alternative to use REST/Proxy?
Thanks
Julio Castillo
NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments to it may be privileged, confidential
or contain trade secret information and is intended only for the
Can you provide some examples on your naming patterns described below?
Thanks
** julio
On 3/3/15, 6:56 AM, "Thunder Stumpges" wrote:
>I'm not sure who you were asking the question to, but since Gwen's was
>not bound to any restrictions just a guideline, I'll assume you meant me
>:)
>
>We have
Although full disk encryption appears to be an easy solution, in our case
that may not be sufficient. For cases where the actual payload needs to be
encrypted, the cost of encryption is paid by the consumer and producers.
Further complicating the matter would be the handling of encryption keys,
etc
