Re: Pulsar and Kafka - Segment Centric vs Partition Centric

e that isn't already suited to the other thread. My 2c, since I follow > this list for Kafka information. > > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Khurrum Nasim <khurrumnas...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Kafka Community, > > > > Has anyone taken a look at this blog po

Pulsar and Kafka - Segment Centric vs Partition Centric

Hi Kafka Community, Has anyone taken a look at this blog post, comparing pulsar and kafka from architectural view? I am wondering how you guys think about segment centric vs partition centric. https://streaml.io/blog/pulsar-segment-based-architecture/ - KN

Re: Comparing Pulsar and Kafka: unified queuing and streaming

mpeting > projects solving all the same use cases. We don't need to try to cram > Pulsar features into Kafka if it's not a good fit and vice versa. At > the > same time, where capabilities do overlap, we can try to learn from > their > experience and they ca

Re: Comparing Pulsar and Kafka: unified queuing and streaming

e > same time, where capabilities do overlap, we can try to learn from their > experience and they can learn from ours. The example of message retention > seemed like one of these instances since there are legitimate use cases and > Pulsar's approach has some benefits. > sure. make sense t

Re: Comparing Pulsar and Kafka: unified queuing and streaming

ack the progress of the group through its committed offsets. It > > might be possible to extend it to automatically delete records in a topic > > after offsets are committed if the topic is known to be exclusively owned > > by the consumer group. We already have the DeleteRecords AP

Re: Comparing Pulsar and Kafka: unified queuing and streaming

t; a matter of some additional topic metadata. I'd be > interested to hear whether this kind of use case is common among our users. > > -Jason > > On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 10:29 PM, Khurrum Nasim <khurrumnas...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Dear Kafka Community, > > >

Comparing Pulsar and Kafka: unified queuing and streaming

Dear Kafka Community, I happened to read this blog post comparing the messaging model between Apache Pulsar and Apache Kafka. It sounds interesting. Apache Pulsar claims to unify streaming (kafka) and queuing (rabbitmq) in one unified API. Pulsar also seems to support Kafka API. Have anyone taken

Re: Networking errors and durability settings

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Bryan Baugher wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Yesterday we had lots of network failures running our Kafka cluster > > (0.9.0.1 ~40 nodes). We run everything using the higher durability > settings > > in order to avoid in data loss, producers