Thanks Ismael and Tao. Appreciate it.
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 7, 2016, at 1:14 AM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
>
> Hi Raj and Tao,
>
> I just merged the KAFKA-3112 PR, so this issue will be fixed in 0.10.0.0.
>
> Thanks,
> Ismael
>
>> O
Hi Raj and Tao,
I just merged the KAFKA-3112 PR, so this issue will be fixed in 0.10.0.0.
Thanks,
Ismael
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 7:47 PM, tao xiao <xiaotao...@gmail.com> wrote:
> KAFKA-2657 is unresolved so you can safely assume it hasn't been fixed yet.
>
> On Fri, 6 May 20
rg/jira/browse/KAFKA-2657 that KAKFA-3112
> duplicates
> > to.
> >
> >> On Thu, 5 May 2016 at 22:13 Raj Tanneru <rtann...@fanatics.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi All,
> >> Does anyone know if KAFKA-3112 is merged to 0.9.0.1? Is there a place t
gt; wrote:
>
> It said this is a duplication. This is the
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2657 that KAKFA-3112 duplicates
> to.
>
>> On Thu, 5 May 2016 at 22:13 Raj Tanneru <rtann...@fanatics.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi All,
>> Does anyo
It said this is a duplication. This is the
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2657 that KAKFA-3112 duplicates
to.
On Thu, 5 May 2016 at 22:13 Raj Tanneru <rtann...@fanatics.com> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> Does anyone know if KAFKA-3112 is merged to 0.9.0.1? Is there a place t
Hi All,
Does anyone know if KAFKA-3112 is merged to 0.9.0.1? Is there a place to check
which version has this fix? Jira doesn’t show fix versions.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3112
Thanks,
Raj Tanneru
Information contained in this e-mail message is confidential. This e-mail