Perfectly Andras ! thank a lot.
I noted all of your explanations 😊 .
best regards,
Adrien
De : Andras Beni
Envoyé : samedi 3 mars 2018 09:29:16
À : users@kafka.apache.org
Objet : Re: difference between 2 options
Hello Adrien,
I was wrong. There is only one
ncept 😊
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> Adrien
>
> ________
> De : Andras Beni
> Envoyé : mardi 27 février 2018 15:41:04
> À : users@kafka.apache.org
> Objet : Re: difference between 2 options
>
> 1) We write out one recovery point per lo
this offset?
I really want to correctly understand the concept 😊
Best regards,
Adrien
De : Andras Beni
Envoyé : mardi 27 février 2018 15:41:04
À : users@kafka.apache.org
Objet : Re: difference between 2 options
1) We write out one recovery point pe
t means the old consumed data ? For example I have 34700 offset, it's to
> avoid reexposing
>
> 34000~34699 records to consumer after crash ?
>
>
> De : Andras Beni
> Envoyé : mardi 27 février 2018 06:16:41
&
___
De : Andras Beni
Envoyé : mardi 27 février 2018 06:16:41
À : users@kafka.apache.org
Objet : Re: difference between 2 options
Hi Adrien,
Every log.flush.offset.checkpoint.interval.ms we write out the current
recovery point for all logs to a text file in the log directory to avoid
recover
Hi Adrien,
Every log.flush.offset.checkpoint.interval.ms we write out the current
recovery point for all logs to a text file in the log directory to avoid
recovering the whole log on startup.
and every log.flush.start.offset.checkpoint.interval.ms we write out the
current log start offset for al
