e-
From: Colt McNealy [mailto:c...@littlehorse.io]
Sent: 26 July 2023 21:08
To: users@kafka.apache.org
Cc: Matthias J. Sax
Subject: Re: Streams/RocksDB: Why Universal Compaction?
Guozhang,
Thanks for your response. That makes a lot of sense; I can't promise any
super-formal benchma
re-examine if they
> > still make sense, and if yes drive it through and merge.
> >
> > Guozhang
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 10:29 AM Matthias J. Sax wrote:
> > >
> > > Do you happen to know?
> > >
> > >
> > > Forwarded
the time to do so. I would be very
> happy in fact if someone could pick that up and re-examine if they
> still make sense, and if yes drive it through and merge.
>
> Guozhang
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 10:29 AM Matthias J. Sax wrote:
> >
> > Do you happen to k
-- Forwarded Message ----
> Subject: Streams/RocksDB: Why Universal Compaction?
> Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 13:19:36 -0700
> From: Colt McNealy
> Reply-To: users@kafka.apache.org
> To: users@kafka.apache.org
>
> Hello there!
>
> I was wondering if anyone (perhaps an early developer
Hello there!
I was wondering if anyone (perhaps an early developer or power-user of
Kafka Streams) knows why the Streams developers made the default setting
for RocksDB compaction "Universal" compaction rather than "Level"
compaction?
My understanding (in which I am extremely UNconfident) is as f
