The error you describe is related to the fake_smsc module, and it means that something
went wrong with the message you submitted using fake_smsc, and not because of how you
wrote the sms-service. I'd say that the exec line you posted looks ok - even if I
wouldn't do it like this.
--
Oded
Thanks for the reply. I'll carry on trying.
You say you wouldn't do it like this - how would you do it? I'm open to any
and all suggestions.
Kenn
- Original Message -
From: Oded Arbel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Domino [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:50 AM
I would call a PHP or PERL CGI to do that, or call exec a PERL script. I don't much
like command line hacking in a configuration that need to be maintained. it's very
nice for one-liners when you are in a hurry, but it's hell to maintain such stuff.
when you need to write something to last -
For now, I'm using fake_smsc; just in the testing phase before we purchase the actual
hardware.
~Hani Mustafa
Oded Arbel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
What SMSC module are you using ?
--
Oded Arbel
m-Wise Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(972)-67-340014
(972)-9-9581711 (ext: 116)
::..
According
fake_smsc doesnot support DLR processing. to simulate SMSC access I suggest that you
use one of the freely available SMPP simulators, or a GSM modem. fake_smsc it a botch
job and I don't recomend using it for anything except maybe load testing.
--
Oded Arbel
m-Wise Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troy Kelly wrote:
I just used CMG's test SMPP application to make sure that Vodafone's
(Australia) SMPP gateway was doing the right thing - and it is.
Please somebody help, I am not getting any content. When I checked
with CMG's app the message_payload contains the message text. But
Hi,
I turned on the dump and there is no message body in the PDU.
2002-06-04 05:48:26 [6] DEBUG: SMPP[test-vf1]: Got PDU:
2002-06-04 05:48:26 [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x100d6228 dump:
2002-06-04 05:48:26 [6] DEBUG: type_name: deliver_sm
2002-06-04 05:48:26 [6] DEBUG: command_id: 5 = 0x0005
