SMPP 3.4 Optional Fields

2002-10-27 Thread Troy Kelly
Hi, I was curious to see if any body has developed a way to handle the optional SMPP 3.4 fields (such as message_payload). Our carrier is insistent that SMPP 3.4 does not use the message_text field but only the message_payload field. We had developed a hack previously that is now

WARNING: SMPP: PDU NUL terminated string has no NUL.

2002-10-27 Thread Cipher Strength
I tried to use SMPP but got following error version = kannel STABLE 1.2.0 SMPP version set = 33 WARNING: SMPP: PDU NUL terminated string has no NUL. 2002-10-28 11:19:11 [5] ERROR: SMP[SMPP:10.200.10.1:5005/5005:testing:test]: SMSC returned error code 0x0058 in response to submit_sm. hope

RE: SMPP 3.4 Optional Fields

2002-10-27 Thread Oded Arbel
Indeed SMPPv3.4 can use message_payload, and if you are using that version, they can sure avoid using message_text. Have you tried setting the interface-version configuration parameter to 33 ? --Oded Arbelm-Wise mobile solutions[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-9-9581711 (116)+972-67-340014