which cells work with kannel

2008-03-15 Thread denis punnoose
Hi all, Has any 1 used a cell as virtual SMSC with kannel successfully, if yes PLZ tell me which cell u used and mail the MODEM conf also. THANK U. - Get the freedom to save as many mails as you wish. Click here to know how.

inbound sms concatenation

2008-03-15 Thread Iain Dooley
hi all, i'm still researching this but thought i'd send off a message here in case anyone had some sample code they could share. i have the following sms-service defined: # SERVICES group = sms-service keyword = keyword-regex = .* catch-all = yes max-messages = 0 get-url =

Re: inbound sms concatenation

2008-03-15 Thread seikath
Hi iain, Its in the core config sms-combine-concatenated-mo = true but there is an issue with VAS related shortcode services : consider this: the SMSC charge each part of a long MO message as one MO so imagine you receive LONG LONG MO concatenated from 5 messages. you will get one MO from the

Re: inbound sms concatenation

2008-03-15 Thread Iain Dooley
hi seik, Its in the core config sms-combine-concatenated-mo = true hmmm what version is that for? i'm running 1.4.1 and when i startup with that in my core config: group = core admin-port = PORT smsbox-port = PORT admin-password = PASS dlr-storage = internal admin-deny-ip = *.*.*.*

Bind Failed

2008-03-15 Thread Iqbal_Ir
Dear all, Last time i've write about gw/smsbox.c:http_queue_thread connect failed The problem already solved now, but i'm facing another problem now. The server unable to bind to port 13000. I've already try to change the port and search for same port that might already been used on conf file

Re: Locating the bottleneck

2008-03-15 Thread Dave Clarke
Just a follow up to say I feel I've ruled out the carrier connection. I routed everything through another bind, to a different carrier and still found 150 messages took 82 seconds. I know this is something very basic, I'm just not seeing it. Dave On 3/15/08, Alejandro Guerrieri [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Locating the bottleneck

2008-03-15 Thread Juan Nin
may it be your internet connection? what kind of connection do you have? what available bandwidth? is it used only by kannel, or also by other services? On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Dave Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a follow up to say I feel I've ruled out the carrier connection.

Re: inbound sms concatenation

2008-03-15 Thread Iain Dooley
okay, so i've fiddled around a bit and reckon i've got this working pretty well now. i wanted to stay with release 1.4.1 so i can keep using the freebsd package as it's easier to maintain but i needed MO concatenation. after looking at some inbound UDH i put this script together. i've added

Re: Locating the bottleneck

2008-03-15 Thread Dave Clarke
Thanks Juan, but definitely not bandwidth issue. Got 3Mb both ways uncontended, and it's working fine. Dave On 3/15/08, Juan Nin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: may it be your internet connection? what kind of connection do you have? what available bandwidth? is it used only by kannel, or also

%P in sms-service

2008-03-15 Thread Iain Dooley
has anyone else seen the problem where %P in your get-url of an sms-service configuration sends the port number rather than the destination number? cheers iain

RE: inbound sms concatenation

2008-03-15 Thread ivars
Does this script work with this UDH (Siemens CX65)? UDH FOR MSG1: 060804005D0201 UDH FOR MSG2: 060804005D0202 I got this UDH from my access.log, %u will be with escape strings (%). Ivars Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 01:46:17 +1100 (EST) From: Iain Dooley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: inbound sms

RE: inbound sms concatenation

2008-03-15 Thread Iain Dooley
Does this script work with this UDH (Siemens CX65)? UDH FOR MSG1: 060804005D0201 UDH FOR MSG2: 060804005D0202 well, i don't really know but it appears to me that it's still the last three chars that contain the most important bits, and they're in the same order as the script i wrote is

RE: inbound sms concatenation

2008-03-15 Thread ivars
UDH is used not only for concatenation! How about this: 050A0304 This UDH in not for concatenated message. The Information Element Identifier for concatenated message must be 00. Normal UDH for concatenated message looks like this: 0500030A0201 05 = Length of User Data Header (not include

RE: GSM DLR from GSM operator for MTs

2008-03-15 Thread Raul Igrisan
I found a solution. sim-buffering = true I’m not very happy with it (because of latency and concern of buffer overrun) but it does the job. I’m looking now at AT+CNMI hoping there is a way to instruct the phone not to store DLRs to SIM but forward them directly to kannel. _ From:

Re: Locating the bottleneck

2008-03-15 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
Are you 100% sure that the problem's not within your application? I'd go nailing one possible point of failure at a time. If you can afford making some tests offline, I'd connect the fake-smsc and simulate a few hundred MO's and see how it perform. If you still have issues using fake-smsc, then

RE: GSM DLR from GSM operator for MTs

2008-03-15 Thread Raul Igrisan
It seems init-string = AT+CNMI=2,2,2,1,0 is the right way to do it. The phone forwards the DLR to kannel as soon as it receives it (very few seconds after the message is sent). _ From: Raul Igrisan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 March 2008 19:02 To: 'info.ubichip'; 'Alvaro

Re: Bind Failed

2008-03-15 Thread Stipe Tolj
2008-03-15 18:11:42 [8031] [0] INFO: HTTP: Opening server at port 13000. 2008-03-15 18:11:42 [8031] [0] ERROR: bind failed 2008-03-15 18:11:42 [8031] [0] ERROR: System error 98: Address already in now, this says it all: the port is in use as the underlying IO socket for that port can't be

Re: %P in sms-service

2008-03-15 Thread Tulga . G
I think it is not destination number. it is my-number in your smsc group. could you send your configuration file? On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Iain Dooley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: has anyone else seen the problem where %P in your get-url of an sms-service configuration sends the port