Are u running kannel under root permission ? may be a permission problem ?
Tharanga Abeyseela
Tony wrote:
I have kannel installed and running fine and I'm able to submit
messages to the server using HTTP.
However I can't see any activity in the log files suggesting kannel is
trying
Hi
Kannel is running as the kannel user.
I changed the log level to 0 and restarted kannel but still don't see any
mention of it trying to connect to the smsc.
Here is the contents of kannel.log:
2009-04-17 10:54:08 [14654] [0] INFO: Added logfile
`/var/log/kannel/kannel.log' with level `0'.
I have kannel installed and running fine and I'm able to submit messages to the
server using HTTP.
However I can't see any activity in the log files suggesting kannel is trying
to connect to my smsc and send the messages.
Even on startup I can't find any mention in the log files of it trying
Here is my startup script
#!/bin/sh
# Configuration file
CONF=/etc/kannel/kannel.conf
SMS1_CONF=/etc/kannel/kannel.conf
# Kannel boxes
BEARERBOX=/usr/local/sbin/bearerbox
SMSBOX=/usr/local/sbin/smsbox
# Debug level: 0..4
DEBUGLEVEL=0
# Kannel user account
USER=kannel
# Check that boxes
try system-type=SMPP
Tharanga wrote:
startup script seems ok. Have u checked all ur config details with ur
SMPP provider ? try a tcpdump to ur smpp server address and see, any
connections going from kannel to that IP address. and also netstat can
help...
but binding details should be
Oops sorry guys I did not see the question had been already replied :)
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
-Original Message-
From: Tharanga thara...@roomsnet.com
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:27:02
To: Tonyt...@eurisp.co.uk
Cc: us...@vm1.kannel.org
Subject: Re: Kannel not connecting
Thanks all for the advice.
I'll start making some changes as suggested and see what I come up with.
Thanks
Tony
- Original Message -
From: Eduardo Raad
To: Tharanga ; users-boun...@vm1.kannel.org ; Tony
Cc: us...@vm1.kannel.org
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 12:09 PM
Hello,
try to add
log-file = /var/log/kannel/mysmsc.log
log-level = 0
into your smsc/smpp section to get more debug information
Regards
#-
# SMSC CONNECTIONS
group = smsc
smsc = smpp
host = ip address removed
port = 8100
smsc-username =
How u start kannel ? can u send ur startup script
Tony wrote:
Hi
Kannel is running as the kannel user.
I changed the log level to 0 and restarted kannel but still don't see
any mention of it trying to connect to the smsc.
Here is the contents of kannel.log:
2009-04-17 10:54:08 [14654]
Tony,
I suggest you change the log files location in the core group configuration
to some folder to which your user has write permissions.
Another option is to run Kannel as root but I don't recommend that for a
production environment.
Eduardo
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
Hi guys,
I was running kannel for 2 weeks with no problems. Today I had to change the
conf file adding one other SMPP connection. After I started bearerbox
binding all the clients, I started the smsbox but I noticed the failure
hours later
2009-04-17 08:23:46 [27278] [0] INFO: Added logfile
startup script seems ok. Have u checked all ur config details with ur
SMPP provider ? try a tcpdump to ur smpp server address and see, any
connections going from kannel to that IP address. and also netstat can
help...
but binding details should be pumped to kannel.log. (smsc connection
Linux version 2.6.18-92.el5 (xxbu...@builderxx.centos.org) (gcc version
4.1.2 20071124 (Red Hat 4.1.2-42)) #1 SMP Tue Jun 10 18:51:06 EDT 2008
Linux #1 SMP Tue Jun 10 18:51:06 EDT 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
2009-04-17 05:31:33 [14770] [38] PANIC: System error 12: Cannot allocate
memory
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 14:32, Elton Hoxha wrote:
I was running kannel for 2 weeks with no problems. Today I had to change the
conf file adding one other SMPP connection. After I started bearerbox
binding all the clients, I started the smsbox but I noticed the failure
hours later
2009-04-17
Hi,
Actually I use 4 bearerbox instances separating my connections. I never had
this type of error even using this configuration below.
group = core
admin-port = 13000
smsbox-port = 13010
sendsms-port = 13015
group = core
admin-port = 13000
smsbox-port = 13020
sendsms-port = 13016
group = core
Hi,
whats the use of four instances ?
use one bearerbox to handle all the smsc connections ..
Elton Hoxha wrote:
Hi,
Actually I use 4 bearerbox instances separating my connections. I never
had this type of error even using this configuration below.
group = core
admin-port = 13000
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 15:00, Elton Hoxha wrote:
Actually I use 4 bearerbox instances separating my connections. I never had
this type of error even using this configuration below.
Interesting idea :). But it is useless (at least) and can lead to
problems.
Actually, that can be cause of your
I use multiple instances because when I add other connections I dont want to
affect the actual ones. So I dont need to stop and start all the
connections, but just one bearerbox instance that holds some specific
connections.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:12 PM, seikath seik...@gmail.com wrote:
just add one more smsc that's it no need to add more cores and add use diff
ports
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Elton Hoxha elt...@gmail.com wrote:
In theory it can be right what you said Milan, but practically I have
started multiple bearerbox instances running on the admin-port 13000
In theory it can be right what you said Milan, but practically I have
started multiple bearerbox instances running on the admin-port 13000 without
having problems for weeks :)
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Milan P. Stanic m...@arvanta.net wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 15:00, Elton Hoxha
Message gives the error
Kannel cant get required memory to run. Try closing some apps to free
up memory and test again
Regards
Alvaro
|-|
Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto
i understand the idea,
but in reality, all modern smsc will keep the MO traffic in the queue till your
esme bind again ...
so its safe to add new smsc and restart the bearerbox ...
and i dont think you add new smsc very often :)
Elton Hoxha wrote:
I use multiple instances because when I add
I think there is an special flag/parameter for compiling kannel in a
64bit environnement. Check mailinglist for details
|-|
Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde
try commercial list as well
commerc...@kannel.org
William Maas wrote:
Hello,
We are a media company located in central America and actually we
looking for a kannel expert/consultant to improve our SMS platform.
Interested ones please contact me at this list or directly to my
Hi,
That's not possible. It contradicts all socket theory. Besides, when you access
through HTTP tcp 13000, which one of the boxes are you administering? Just
assign different admin port to each one. You cannot disable it.
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: Elton Hoxha
To:
Hi,
Don't use NULL in your configuration. NULL is a string with value NULL,
whereas configuration expects legitimate value or nothing at all, in which case
it takes it as NULL.
Just comment out all NULLs and you should be OK.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: Tony
To:
Hi,
Please run logs @level 0 giving 10 more lines at start before the problem.
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: Pyro Surya
To: users@kannel.org
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 1:56 PM
Subject: why it is dying?
Linux version 2.6.18-92.el5 (xxbu...@builderxx.centos.org) (gcc
Its totally possibleall 4 conf files used by 4 bearerboxes have the same
admin-port 13000 and the routing of SMS through different SMPP connections
is done without problems. My problem consisted only at sms-box error message
that I couldnt understand but I suspect it was because one old smsbox
OK, then, please rewrite all C and sockets and start your own
college...Assuming of course that all bearerbox instances live on the same
server...
- Original Message -
From: Elton Hoxha
To: Nikos Balkanas
Cc: users@kannel.org
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 1:10 AM
Elton, it's not possible for more than one process to listen on the
same address/port combination at the same time.
Once a process attachs to a socket, it locks it until it releases.
That's the address already in use error you get. It's just like
trying to put two keys on the same lock at the
I think there is a misunderstanding. I was refering to the port that SMS-BOX
is listening and we got confused with the admin-port. Of course all my
instances have different sms-box ports. I was just claiming that, having the
admin-port 13000 for all instances that bind successfully, it does not
31 matches
Mail list logo