Re: Re: Submission: test/fakesmpp.c

Please, do not send out-of-office messages to the list. Thanks, Nikos - Original Message - From: s...@adc.org To: nbalka...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 4:00 PM Subject: Re: Re: Submission: test/fakesmpp.c I will be out of the office from July 8- July 18, 2010 and will

window parameter

Dear All, I am using kannel client, can anyone help me regarding window parameter as how to use it. Should I use flow-control parameter with it and if TPS is 10 then How much window size should I set ? Thanks, Sandesh

Preferred engine type for MySql DLR storage

Hi Users I know this question is more to do with MySQL than Kannel but does anyone here have a recommendation on the engine type for the MySQL table. Does Kannel have a preference? At the moment I am using innoDB. With regards to indexes on the table are there any recommendations? Looking at the

Re: Preferred engine type for MySql DLR storage

Thanks for the feedback Alex. Are you suggesting that MyISAM is perhaps better? On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Alejandro Guerrieri alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com wrote: InnoDB is a bad idea if you're expecting to have a big number of DLR's waiting: The DLR engine uses SELECT COUNT(*) which

Kannel DLR step by step

Hi. experts I have done some reading up on setting up DLR's for Kannel and drew up this little step by step. I added a few questions for each step that I require some help with, if you wouldn't mind answering them? This is not complete guide yet but I hope we can draw up some form of

Re: Preferred engine type for MySql DLR storage

Yes, definitely. We tried both, MyISAM performs way better. On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:58 AM, brett skinner tatty.dishcl...@gmail.comwrote: Thanks for the feedback Alex. Are you suggesting that MyISAM is perhaps better? On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Alejandro Guerrieri

Re: Preferred engine type for MySql DLR storage

Thanks that is very interesting. I will give it a try with MyISAM. Did you guys change the default InnoDB settings because I know with the defaults that it is painful to say the least. Regards, On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Alejandro Guerrieri alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com wrote: Yes,

Re: Preferred engine type for MySql DLR storage

InnoDB is a bad idea if you're expecting to have a big number of DLR's waiting: The DLR engine uses SELECT COUNT(*) which happens to be painfully slow on InnoDB. The data won't be minimal, and you'll end up having to manually purge old records (sometimes not all DLR's are received back from the

Re: window parameter

Use max-pending-submits=20 (or whatever allowed to you.) in group=smsc configuration. --- On Wed, 14/7/10, Sandesh Waman // Viva sand...@vivainfomedia.com wrote: From: Sandesh Waman // Viva sand...@vivainfomedia.com Subject: window parameter To: Kannel Users users@kannel.org Date:

Re: Kannel DLR step by step

On step 3 you don't want to do an UPDATE over your messages table, unless you have low traffic levels. Under high load traffic the updates will have a high cost, probably generating locks on your DB tables and slowing things up. It's better to insert them on a separate table. If you don't have