Guys,
When I do reply any Kannel mail then To field filled by sender, not by
users@kannel.org. This is not good since we must use Reply All that caused
double messages.
Regards, Wendy
On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 18:10, Wendy William wrote:
When I do reply any Kannel mail then To field filled by sender, not by
users@kannel.org. This is not good since we must use Reply All that caused
double messages.
Check your e-mail client software and see if it have reply to list (or
The good or not good depends on each person...
There's always debate on this topic on every mailing-list, where some
people claim one way is the correct or better one, and some people
claim it's the other one, and each of them have their good reasons...
Search on google and you'll find tons
We've been through this before :) I think a few times (once in my memory
but I'm a relative newbie).
Anyway, just reply all - people's mail clients will deduplicate the
messages as they'll all have the same message id.
For example, Juan, you only received this once right?
Cheers,
Iain
On
Exactly, got it only once :)
On 8/21/11 11:13 AM, Iain Dooley wrote:
We've been through this before :) I think a few times (once in my
memory but I'm a relative newbie).
Anyway, just reply all - people's mail clients will deduplicate the
messages as they'll all have the same message id.
Rene... what if DLR-store is set to DB and Kannel was never restarted, would
Kannel ever fail to call the DLR URL when it does have a DLR from the SMSC ?
Essentially, am trying to see how reliable Kannel can be in managing DLR.
--
Regards
Kenny
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Rene Kluwen
On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 11:08, Juan Nin wrote:
The good or not good depends on each person...
Well, yes. There is proper also.
There's always debate on this topic on every mailing-list, where
some people claim one way is the correct or better one, and some
people claim it's the other one, and
[ This is OT, but ... ]
On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 09:01, Alvaro Cornejo wrote:
Hi I don't know debian but why would you do
1. download latest trunk from svn
2. ./configure --with-mysql
3. dpkg-buildpackage
instead of
1. download latest trunk from svn
2. ./configure --with-mysql
3.
Wa Alikum AL-Salam
Hi Bassam and Ramadhan kreem,
I will try to contact the SMSC and figure out if they can help us regarding
this issue,
kannel 1.5 development release is out but i guess we cant relay on it since
it is not stable yet.
Thank you Bassam, which you all the best
Best Regards.
On
Hi,
1.5.0 is just labeled Development since it is the latest release. It is
production stable and you should prefer it, since it has many
fixes/enhancements over previous releases.
BR,
Nikos
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Ahmed AL-Tahami ahmed...@gmail.comwrote:
Wa Alikum AL-Salam
Hi
Milan, I don't take it as an offense at all, not sure what you
understood with my reply, but it was not directed to you at all, was
directed to Wendy the original poster :)
On 8/21/11 3:55 PM, Milan P. Stanic wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 11:08, Juan Nin wrote:
The good or not good depends
The second way works fine, that is why I'm very curious why
dpkg-buildpackage do not work as it should. If libraries are correct for
./configrue make make install so how they can't be for debian
package tool?!
I also dislike dev. tools on production, and distro package tools gives
me nice,
12 matches
Mail list logo
