RE: Kannel TPS reduces gradually if DLR is used

Hello Jeff, I’m not storing the dlrs in a db. Regards, Nanda From: Jeff Thorn [mailto:j...@thorntechnologies.com] Sent: 24 April 2016 17:18 To: Nanda Kumar P Cc: users@kannel.org; Vangelis Typaldos Subject: RE: Kannel TPS reduces gradually if DLR is used Are you storing dlrs in a database? Wit

RE: Kannel TPS reduces gradually if DLR is used

Are you storing dlrs in a database? Without the proper indexes it performance will definitely degrade as it takes longer and longer to look up the dlr. Kannel doesn't optimize the dlr database. You need to do that. On Apr 24, 2016 5:55 AM, "Nanda Kumar P" wrote: > Thanks for the quick response Va

RE: Kannel TPS reduces gradually if DLR is used

Thanks for the quick response Vangelis. For point #1, All my texts are under less the 50 ASCII characters each. So I expect one DLR for one outgoing SMS. Is there anything that I’m missing? Please do let me know if there is any other information required. I’ll be happy to share. Thanks & Rega

RE: Kannel TPS reduces gradually if DLR is used

For point 1: It sounds like you get DLR for multipart sms. Note that for multipart messages you receive DLR for each part. For point 2: You are absolutely correct. Ignore my statement. My bad. BR From: Nanda Kumar P Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2016 10:34 AM To: Vang

RE: Kannel TPS reduces gradually if DLR is used

Thank you Vangelis. Few follow up questions though: 1. While I understand the point about the throughput dropping to half, I fail to understand how it went as low as 25 per second. 2. What is the significance of changing the dlr-mask from 3 to 7 or 15? Would it not lower the speeds

RE: Kannel TPS reduces gradually if DLR is used

The throughput assigned by your operator/smsc includes DLR activity. So the actual bind throughput would drop to the half you if you request DLR for any MT. I would suggest to raise dlr-mask from 3 to 7 or 15. Kind Regards, Vangelis From: Nanda Kumar P Sent: Sunda