Hi Rene!
Can it be that I am the first person using sqlbox with postgresql?
I found some postgresql related bugs in sqlbox_pgsql.c from
sqlbox_patch-20041031.tar. (Looks like copy and paste bugs)
I would be great if you can review the suggested changes and include
them into your patch.
1.
When
Hello Klaus,
An answer to your question, one by one:
Sqlbox is not included in CVS as of yet.
You can compile with either MySQL or Postgres support alternatively.
Both will work.
The latest patch is against CVS version of Oktober 31th but should be
applicable to current HEAD as well. In case
Hi Rene!
Thanks for your answers. I will try it step by step. I now compile CVS
from source with pgsql support and test the DB-connectivity using DLR
storage. If this works, i will test the sqlbox.
I reviewed the patch and found some stuff for MSSQL. Sothis patch is not
only for sqlbox, but
Klaus Darilion klaus.kannel at pernau.at writes:
hi Klaus,
just want to ask u something about receiving sms from the smsc.
do i need to specify any port for the smsc to connect to my server? or the
current port and receving-port variable will be enough?
thx for your time.
Hi all!
I'm
Hi Jason!
I'm also a newbie, but this is my working configuration (NowSMS acts as
SMSC).
# the bearerbox connects to the SMSCs
group = smsc
smsc = smpp
smsc-id = klaussmsc
host = 8.12.12.12
# transceiver only supported bym SMPP =3.4
# transceiver-mode = 1
#
# these ports are configured at the
Hello Klaus,
Yeah, there's priliminary code for MS-SQL for dlr storage and sqlbox
tables (sending and receiving).
However, this code has never been tested by myself and AFAIK also not by
others.
Rene Kluwen
Chimit
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi Rene!
Thanks for your answers. I will try it step by
hi jason
yes u require atleast one port to connect to the smsc, if u keep just
current port(nothing but the transmitter port if u opt for separate
ports for Rx and Tx) and receiving port means (the receiver port), if u
go for Transceiver mode to ur smsc then u need to just have the current
port
