Re: sqlbox upgrade

2009-02-21 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
Manoj, The only risk you may face is that the tables have varied. So, to play safe: 1. Make sure that the send_sms table is empty (no pending messages) and drop the table. 2. Backup the sent_sms table and drop it as well. 3. Install sqlbox, it'll recreate the send_sms and sent_sms tables from

Re: sqlbox upgrade

2009-02-21 Thread Manoj Bhamare
: sqlbox upgrade Manoj, The only risk you may face is that the tables have varied. So, to play safe: 1. Make sure that the send_sms table is empty (no pending messages) and drop the table. 2. Backup the sent_sms table and drop it as well. 3. Install sqlbox, it'll recreate the send_sms

Re: sqlbox upgrade

2009-02-21 Thread sangprabv
Hi AG, Does current SQLBox has already capture foreign_id value? TIA Willy

Re: sqlbox upgrade

2009-02-21 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
I still have to try it to be honest, but since it's a separate field, it'd need an extra column on the DB of course. I'll provide a patch to do it soon. Regards, Alejandro. On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 3:42 PM, sangprabv sangpr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi AG, Does current SQLBox has already capture